Brockport, NY - Brockport, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LEE Caden | - | - | - | - | 5% | 30% | 65% |
| 2 | DU Samuel R. | - | - | 2% | 27% | 50% | 21% | |
| 3 | LI Richard | - | - | < 1% | 5% | 40% | 55% | |
| 3 | VASILIEV Sacha M. | - | - | - | 3% | 24% | 73% | |
| 5 | XIAO Anthony | - | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 40% | 25% |
| 6 | ZELTSER Lawrence M. | - | - | 3% | 21% | 52% | 24% | |
| 7 | KAZA Nitish | - | 3% | 16% | 38% | 34% | 10% | |
| 8 | MILLER Aidan A. | 6% | 30% | 41% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 9 | TSIMIKLIS Yanni | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 3% |
| 10 | PYO Michael M. | - | - | 5% | 24% | 43% | 27% | |
| 11 | WOODTHORPE Michael G. | 12% | 42% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 12 | ORVANANOS Jorge | - | - | 2% | 16% | 40% | 36% | 6% |
| 13 | KULKARNI Ansh A. | - | - | 6% | 42% | 41% | 10% | |
| 14 | BLAKE Ryan J. | 6% | 26% | 40% | 24% | 4% | - | |
| 15 | BELLUOMO David C. | 8% | 35% | 39% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 16 | ZHAI Jeffrey | - | 3% | 18% | 41% | 34% | 4% | |
| 17 | ZHANG Yun Isaac | - | - | 1% | 13% | 45% | 41% | |
| 18 | WANG Gerald Y. | 3% | 19% | 39% | 30% | 8% | - | |
| 19 | ALIMI Yacine A. | - | 1% | 13% | 36% | 36% | 13% | 1% |
| 20 | OROSZLAN Daniel | - | 1% | 11% | 35% | 39% | 13% | |
| 21 | ZHAO Jesse | 2% | 16% | 37% | 34% | 10% | 1% | |
| 22 | SANTULLI Tristan | 1% | 5% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
| 23 | SYOMICHEV Gleb A. | - | 2% | 13% | 36% | 36% | 13% | 1% |
| 24 | ZHOU Jimmy | 48% | 39% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
| 25 | BAO Wenyuan | 6% | 34% | 50% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 26 | QI Steve | 3% | 21% | 43% | 28% | 4% | - | |
| 27 | TALLARICO Matthew | 4% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 28 | DEGROOT Blake | 5% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 29 | ZHONG Guoren | 1% | 14% | 40% | 33% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 30 | LIGOS Alex M. | 26% | 41% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 31 | XU Mathu Yang | 37% | 48% | 14% | 1% | - | - | |
| 32 | WERWA Griffith | 4% | 30% | 41% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 33 | TANG Luke | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
| 34 | VENKATESH Aditya | 39% | 46% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 35 | LU Xiao | 29% | 49% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 36 | CHEN Derek | 31% | 50% | 17% | 1% | - | - | |
| 37 | ZHANG Huaxu | 28% | 44% | 23% | 5% | - | - | |
| 38 | RYNSKI Gerik | 46% | 40% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.