Brockport, NY - Brockport, NY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LEE Caden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 65% |
| 2 | DU Samuel R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 71% | 21% | |
| 3 | LI Richard | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 55% | |
| 3 | VASILIEV Sacha M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 73% | |
| 5 | XIAO Anthony | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 25% |
| 6 | ZELTSER Lawrence M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 24% | |
| 7 | KAZA Nitish | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 44% | 10% | |
| 8 | MILLER Aidan A. | 100% | 94% | 64% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 9 | TSIMIKLIS Yanni | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 52% | 20% | 3% |
| 10 | PYO Michael M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 27% | |
| 11 | WOODTHORPE Michael G. | 100% | 88% | 46% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 12 | ORVANANOS Jorge | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 42% | 6% |
| 13 | KULKARNI Ansh A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 51% | 10% | |
| 14 | BLAKE Ryan J. | 100% | 94% | 68% | 28% | 4% | - | |
| 15 | BELLUOMO David C. | 100% | 92% | 57% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 16 | ZHAI Jeffrey | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 38% | 4% | |
| 17 | ZHANG Yun Isaac | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 41% | |
| 18 | WANG Gerald Y. | 100% | 97% | 77% | 39% | 9% | - | |
| 19 | ALIMI Yacine A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 50% | 14% | 1% |
| 20 | OROSZLAN Daniel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 53% | 13% | |
| 21 | ZHAO Jesse | 100% | 98% | 82% | 45% | 11% | 1% | |
| 22 | SANTULLI Tristan | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
| 23 | SYOMICHEV Gleb A. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 14% | 1% |
| 24 | ZHOU Jimmy | 100% | 52% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
| 25 | BAO Wenyuan | 100% | 94% | 60% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 26 | QI Steve | 100% | 97% | 76% | 33% | 5% | - | |
| 27 | TALLARICO Matthew | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 28 | DEGROOT Blake | 100% | 95% | 74% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 29 | ZHONG Guoren | 100% | 99% | 85% | 45% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 30 | LIGOS Alex M. | 100% | 74% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 31 | XU Mathu Yang | 100% | 63% | 15% | 1% | - | - | |
| 32 | WERWA Griffith | 100% | 96% | 65% | 24% | 4% | - | |
| 33 | TANG Luke | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 54% | 20% | 3% |
| 34 | VENKATESH Aditya | 100% | 61% | 15% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 35 | LU Xiao | 100% | 71% | 22% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 36 | CHEN Derek | 100% | 69% | 18% | 1% | - | - | |
| 37 | ZHANG Huaxu | 100% | 72% | 28% | 5% | - | - | |
| 38 | RYNSKI Gerik | 100% | 54% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.