Liontree Arena (RIMAC) @ UC San Diego - La Jolla, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | DESHMUKH Arjun | - | - | - | - | 4% | 28% | 67% |
2 | CORTRIGHT Skipper | - | - | - | 4% | 21% | 43% | 31% |
3 | GUERRA Gabriel H. | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 53% |
3 | LIN Youlong | - | - | - | 5% | 30% | 65% | |
5 | CHEN Matthew | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 41% | 27% |
6 | CO Dylan | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 39% | 50% |
7 | CANLAS Nathan | - | - | - | - | 7% | 36% | 57% |
8 | KIM Brian | - | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 34% | 7% |
9 | ZHANG Aaron | - | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 42% | 20% |
10 | LI Richard | - | - | 5% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 5% |
11 | CHANG Jonathan | - | - | 3% | 18% | 39% | 32% | 7% |
12 | QIU Zhaocheng | - | 1% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 15% | 2% |
13 | NGUYEN Martin | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 42% | 31% |
14 | CHOI Ethan | - | - | 1% | 9% | 33% | 44% | 12% |
15 | BAE Eugene | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 6% |
16 | KIM Aiden | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 34% | 13% | 1% |
17 | LO Preston | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 20% | |
18 | RODRIGUEZ Tyler | - | 2% | 18% | 38% | 31% | 10% | 1% |
19 | CHUANG Oscar | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 8% |
20 | LOZANO Veyron Jericho | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 5% |
21 | ROZALSKI Eli | - | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 37% | 12% |
22 | GOH Jonas | - | 5% | 22% | 40% | 28% | 4% | |
23 | LI Lucas | 6% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
24 | WONG Evan | 2% | 13% | 34% | 36% | 14% | 1% | |
25 | PARK Sky | - | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 41% | 20% |
26 | ZHANG Jacob | - | - | 4% | 21% | 40% | 29% | 5% |
27 | LEE Jaden | - | 4% | 21% | 39% | 28% | 8% | 1% |
28 | CAJERO Luis O. | 7% | 33% | 39% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
29 | FOY Grant | 19% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
30 | LE Jacob H. | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 41% | 19% | |
31 | LI Daniel | 1% | 11% | 34% | 37% | 15% | 2% | - |
32 | SCHIENEMAN Valentine | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
33 | BORG Matthew | 2% | 13% | 33% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
34 | LEE Christopher T. | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% |
35 | ZHOU Shawn | 2% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 15% | 2% | |
37 | LIU William | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 3% |
38 | PETROV Mikhail | 8% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
38 | HOWLAND Jonas | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% |
40 | CHOI Ethan | 7% | 30% | 39% | 20% | 4% | - | |
41 | NAVARRO Kato | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 34% | 13% | 2% |
42 | BIELER Mason | 2% | 13% | 34% | 34% | 15% | 2% | |
43 | PE Noah | 10% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - | |
44 | SUMIN Yang | 4% | 31% | 41% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
45 | GUDIMETLA Siddhanth | 29% | 42% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
46 | PONTOPPIDAN Erik | 9% | 44% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
46 | TSOI Spencer | 2% | 21% | 42% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
48 | MCKEE Calvin | - | 4% | 24% | 40% | 25% | 6% | - |
49 | CLARK Benjamin | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - |
50 | KIM Jonah | 1% | 12% | 33% | 36% | 15% | 2% | - |
51 | WEI Winston | 2% | 20% | 42% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
52 | WANG sicheng | 6% | 34% | 39% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
53 | VARIDIREDDY Suhan | 27% | 52% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
54 | KUNTSEVICH Ivan I. | 1% | 13% | 36% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - |
54 | TSUI Raedyn Ho Hin | 22% | 42% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
56 | LEHTINEN Axel | 39% | 42% | 16% | 3% | - | - | |
57 | YAO Pincheng | - | 2% | 16% | 37% | 33% | 11% | 1% |
58 | SISINNI Leonardo | 3% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 8% | - | |
59 | DUNLAP Ezra | 24% | 40% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
60 | ZHAN Kevin | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
61 | ZHONG Maxwell | 1% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
62 | LEE Christopher | 49% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
63 | ONG Nicholas | 1% | 8% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 5% | - |
64 | MARSHALL Kyler | 72% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
65 | DACKO Nolan | 49% | 43% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
66 | YUE Jackson | 2% | 18% | 38% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - |
67 | YOUNG Luke | 64% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
68 | HONG Edwin | 40% | 42% | 16% | 3% | - | - | |
69 | TONEF Christian | 64% | 31% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.