Factory 220 - Passaic, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WANG Joanna | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 44% | 45% |
| 2 | TANG Melody Fujiao | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 40% | 20% | |
| 3 | FENG Grace | - | - | - | - | 6% | 34% | 60% |
| 3 | WANG Amabel | - | - | - | 3% | 25% | 50% | 22% |
| 5 | LI Han (Helina) | - | - | 8% | 31% | 43% | 18% | |
| 6 | LI Katerina | - | - | 4% | 20% | 39% | 31% | 5% |
| 7 | HARRIS Julia | - | 7% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 4% | |
| 8 | ZELDIN Nadia | - | - | 1% | 13% | 49% | 32% | 5% |
| 9 | LI Eleanor | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 36% | 15% |
| 10 | EYER Brooke | - | 11% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 11 | TSIMIKLIS Aphrodite | - | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 42% | 9% |
| 12 | MCSHERRY Ava | - | - | - | - | 5% | 31% | 63% |
| 13 | PEVZNER Nicole | - | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 10% |
| 14 | JIANG Chloe | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 15 | DIMATULAC Elise Ann | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 9% |
| 16 | VACCARO Lillian | 78% | 21% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 17 | DE CASTRO Kai | - | 4% | 28% | 44% | 21% | 3% | - |
| 18 | MCSHERRY Kayla | - | 7% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 19 | ROZPEDOWSKI Claire | - | - | - | 4% | 27% | 69% | |
| 20 | LI Savannah | - | 7% | 29% | 43% | 19% | 2% | |
| 21 | OLAWOYE Jadesola | 2% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 22 | LIU Angel(Daying) | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 16% |
| 23 | MCFARLANE Asha | - | 6% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 24 | DAI Zizhuo (Zizi) | - | - | 5% | 26% | 44% | 24% | |
| 25 | KAPRAN Anastasia | - | 1% | 14% | 39% | 35% | 10% | |
| 26 | ORBÉ-AUSTIN Maya | 1% | 16% | 35% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 27 | SHMAY Anastasia | - | 3% | 19% | 38% | 31% | 8% | |
| 28 | YU Jane | - | 2% | 14% | 40% | 38% | 6% | |
| 29 | SFINTESCU Emma | 7% | 40% | 39% | 13% | 1% | - | |
| 30 | BERGEL Daphne | - | - | 4% | 22% | 44% | 26% | 4% |
| 31 | PAULUS Sloane E. | - | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 11% |
| 32 | LI Joy | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 37% | 17% | 2% |
| 33 | ORBE-AUSTIN Nia | 2% | 18% | 42% | 30% | 7% | - | |
| 34 | SHERLOCK Gabriella | 1% | 12% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 35 | STEWART Isla | 28% | 52% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 36 | LAZAR Carolina | 2% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 37 | COLE Sofia | - | 10% | 41% | 37% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 38 | BASILE Gianna | - | 10% | 41% | 36% | 12% | 1% | |
| 39 | ZHU Ella | 42% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
| 40 | PEVZNER Sophia | 2% | 19% | 51% | 25% | 3% | - | - |
| 41 | ZHAO Sinuo | 1% | 7% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 42 | CHO Olivia | - | 4% | 27% | 50% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 43 | SONG Sarah | 67% | 30% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 44 | XIE Lillian | - | 3% | 19% | 38% | 31% | 9% | |
| 44 | LIU Yinuo | 20% | 46% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 46 | MANGLANI Maya | 10% | 56% | 29% | 5% | - | - | |
| 47 | ROBERTS Anastasia | 1% | 25% | 41% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 48 | LENZ Phoebe | 47% | 44% | 9% | - | - | - | - |
| 49 | BEKIYANTS Elizabeth | 66% | 29% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 50 | BECK Liliyana | 67% | 29% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 51 | GOMEZ Sofia | 63% | 31% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 51 | CLARK Lillian | 16% | 55% | 25% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 51 | JAIN Dia | 90% | 9% | - | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.