Factory 220 - Passaic, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | XIAN kevin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 75% |
| 2 | SONG Enoch | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 30% | |
| 3 | CAO Joshua | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 40% | |
| 3 | CAO Aaron | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 22% | ||
| 5 | VENAFRO Tristan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 50% | ||
| 6 | SHEN Lucas | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 41% | 7% | |
| 7 | XU ETHAN | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 21% | 2% | |
| 8 | HU Michael | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 35% | ||
| 9 | QIAN Will | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 56% | |
| 10 | ZHANG Eric | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 9% | |
| 11 | ROPER Griffin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 17% | |
| 12 | XIA Vincent | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 34% | 7% | |
| 13 | XU Jonathan | 100% | 87% | 50% | 14% | 1% | ||
| 14 | TARDIFF Owen | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 32% | 6% | - |
| 15 | WU David | 100% | 98% | 83% | 46% | 13% | 1% | |
| 16 | XIE Jayden | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 65% | 19% | |
| 17 | CHONG Cooper | 100% | 85% | 43% | 10% | 1% | ||
| 18 | GUGALA Frank | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 23% | 2% |
| 19 | HAN Jiaren | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 34% | 3% |
| 20 | YANG Luca | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 19% | |
| 21 | LEE Ryan | 100% | 93% | 62% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 22 | WU Yulen | 100% | 97% | 79% | 41% | 11% | 1% | |
| 23 | LEONG Michael | 100% | 81% | 40% | 10% | 1% | ||
| 24 | GENG Vincent | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 29% | 4% | |
| 25 | BRADY David | 100% | 95% | 71% | 35% | 9% | 1% | |
| 26 | WU Connor | 100% | 93% | 63% | 22% | 3% | - | |
| 27 | XIE zhouhan | 100% | 82% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 28 | CHEN Keegan | 100% | 94% | 66% | 26% | 4% | ||
| 29 | CAI Charlie | 100% | 95% | 68% | 28% | 5% | - | |
| 30 | LEVKOVICH Milan | 100% | 82% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 31 | MACKENZIE Dylan | 100% | 90% | 55% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 32 | RAY William | 100% | 94% | 66% | 26% | 3% | ||
| 33 | XU Jaden | 100% | 69% | 24% | 4% | - | ||
| 34 | POLEBOYINA Aarav | 100% | 59% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
| 35 | LIN Alexander | 100% | 86% | 48% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 36 | SAVIR Ethan | 100% | 91% | 57% | 17% | 2% | ||
| 37 | FAN Oscar | 100% | 60% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
| 38 | AWALGAONKAR Aahan | 100% | 92% | 58% | 19% | 2% | - | |
| 39 | CAI daniel | 100% | 50% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
| 40 | CAI Mark | 100% | 89% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 41 | WILSON Henry | 100% | 86% | 48% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.