Prime Fencing Academy - Dublin, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | BURLINGAME Owen | - | 2% | 16% | 39% | 35% | 8% | < 1% |
| 2 | PRICE Cory J. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 43% | 20% |
| 3 | GARCIA Carter | - | 3% | 24% | 47% | 23% | 2% | < 1% |
| 3 | KULKARNI Myra | 2% | 19% | 43% | 29% | 7% | - | < 1% |
| 5 | MOGAN Asmita | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 4% |
| 6 | KONCHENKO Ilya | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 42% | 48% |
| 7 | MUNSHI Meher | - | 3% | 12% | 27% | 33% | 20% | 5% |
| 8 | YANG Naomi | 10% | 34% | 39% | 16% | 1% | < 1% | - |
| 9 | FERREYRA Emilio | 16% | 41% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 10 | KOLBASSOV Matvey | 1% | 7% | 22% | 33% | 26% | 10% | 1% |
| 11 | FANG Elliott | - | 1% | 12% | 37% | 37% | 12% | 1% |
| 12 | RAJU Avinash | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 5% |
| 12 | HUANG Barron | - | 2% | 14% | 43% | 34% | 7% | - |
| 14 | YUAN Elvis | 6% | 27% | 37% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 15 | RASTOGI Saiansh | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 16 | BOSCHEN SHIH Aedan | - | - | 2% | 15% | 41% | 40% | 2% |
| 17 | QURESHI Nauman | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 19% |
| 18 | CONRAD Madeleine | - | - | - | 5% | 27% | 45% | 22% |
| 19 | RENGANATHAN Krithiga | 1% | 10% | 30% | 39% | 20% | 1% | - |
| 20 | DO Justin | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
| 21 | BAINDLA Rushil | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 42% | 23% | 3% |
| 22 | HOQUE Raiden | - | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 9% |
| 23 | LIM Stella | 71% | 26% | 3% | < 1% | - | - | - |
| 24 | GUPTA Pearl | - | 2% | 22% | 41% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
| 25 | RAO Diksha | - | 1% | 21% | 42% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 26 | HARPALE Oorja | 1% | 8% | 23% | 33% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 27 | CHENG Maxwell | 15% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 28 | HUEY Courtney | 2% | 13% | 27% | 31% | 20% | 7% | 1% |
| 29 | CHHANYA Sanaiya | 2% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 30 | SUNG Ryan | - | 3% | 19% | 42% | 31% | 5% | - |
| 31 | CHAUDHARY Anvika | - | 7% | 27% | 37% | 23% | 6% | - |
| 32 | YANG Patricia | - | 16% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 33 | KAAKATI Noor | - | - | 10% | 39% | 39% | 10% | 1% |
| 34 | VENKAT Aadhya | - | 7% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 35 | YOU Leor | 7% | 34% | 38% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 35 | SIDES Kyle | 4% | 18% | 31% | 29% | 14% | 4% | - |
| 37 | ZHANG Tiffany | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 38 | IM Nora | 3% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 38 | COKYN-LEVY Josephine | < 1% | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 5% |
| 40 | SHAJU Harshika | 1% | 21% | 41% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 41 | VUNDAVALLY Ria | 16% | 37% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 42 | OUEDRAOGO Joseph | < 1% | 8% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.