Prime Fencing Academy - Dublin, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | BURLINGAME Owen | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 43% | 8% | < 1% |
2 | PRICE Cory J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 20% |
3 | GARCIA Carter | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 26% | 2% | < 1% |
3 | KULKARNI Myra | 100% | 98% | 79% | 36% | 7% | - | < 1% |
5 | MOGAN Asmita | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 56% | 23% | 4% |
6 | KONCHENKO Ilya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 48% |
7 | MUNSHI Meher | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 58% | 25% | 5% |
8 | YANG Naomi | 100% | 90% | 57% | 18% | 2% | < 1% | - |
9 | FERREYRA Emilio | 100% | 84% | 43% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
10 | KOLBASSOV Matvey | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
11 | FANG Elliott | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 49% | 13% | 1% |
12 | RAJU Avinash | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 34% | 5% |
12 | HUANG Barron | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 41% | 8% | - |
14 | YUAN Elvis | 100% | 94% | 67% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
15 | RASTOGI Saiansh | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 18% | 4% | - |
16 | BOSCHEN SHIH Aedan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 42% | 2% |
17 | QURESHI Nauman | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 19% |
18 | CONRAD Madeleine | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 67% | 22% |
19 | RENGANATHAN Krithiga | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 20% | 1% | - |
20 | DO Justin | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 50% | 16% | 2% |
21 | BAINDLA Rushil | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 26% | 3% |
22 | HOQUE Raiden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 9% |
23 | LIM Stella | 100% | 29% | 3% | < 1% | - | - | - |
24 | GUPTA Pearl | 100% | 100% | 98% | 76% | 36% | 8% | 1% |
25 | RAO Diksha | 100% | 100% | 99% | 78% | 36% | 8% | 1% |
26 | HARPALE Oorja | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
27 | CHENG Maxwell | 100% | 85% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
28 | HUEY Courtney | 100% | 98% | 85% | 58% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
29 | CHHANYA Sanaiya | 100% | 98% | 83% | 47% | 12% | 1% | - |
30 | SUNG Ryan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 36% | 5% | - |
31 | CHAUDHARY Anvika | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 29% | 6% | - |
32 | YANG Patricia | 100% | 100% | 84% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - |
33 | KAAKATI Noor | 100% | 100% | 100% | 89% | 50% | 11% | 1% |
34 | VENKAT Aadhya | 100% | 100% | 92% | 65% | 26% | 5% | - |
35 | YOU Leor | 100% | 93% | 59% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
35 | SIDES Kyle | 100% | 96% | 78% | 47% | 18% | 4% | - |
37 | ZHANG Tiffany | 100% | 93% | 67% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
38 | IM Nora | 100% | 97% | 78% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
38 | COKYN-LEVY Josephine | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 29% | 5% |
40 | SHAJU Harshika | 100% | 99% | 78% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - |
41 | VUNDAVALLY Ria | 100% | 84% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
42 | OUEDRAOGO Joseph | 100% | 100% | 91% | 65% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.