Factory 220 - Passaic, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CHA James | - | - | 2% | 11% | 38% | 49% | |
| 2 | TARCHICHI Robby | - | - | 1% | 11% | 34% | 40% | 13% |
| 3 | XU Nathan | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 39% | 19% | |
| 3 | HAN Alexander | - | - | 3% | 19% | 45% | 33% | |
| 5 | XIE Jicheng | - | - | - | 4% | 18% | 41% | 36% |
| 6 | LEE Charles T | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 42% | 22% | |
| 7 | JIMENEZ Naveen | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 53% |
| 8 | KUO Phineas | - | 1% | 10% | 33% | 43% | 14% | |
| 9 | KIM Daniel | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 33% | 12% | 1% |
| 10 | MARTIRE Luca | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 16% | |
| 11 | METZ Mason | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 43% | 19% | |
| 12 | WONG Jacob W. | - | - | 4% | 21% | 43% | 30% | |
| 13 | PARKER Isaiah | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 43% | 40% |
| 14 | LEE Thomas | - | 1% | 12% | 35% | 36% | 14% | 2% |
| 15 | OH Joshua | 1% | 12% | 34% | 36% | 15% | 2% | |
| 16 | ONIK Ari N. | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 23% | 6% | |
| 17 | BAI Austin | - | - | 1% | 12% | 41% | 46% | |
| 18 | ZHENG Austin | 4% | 23% | 40% | 26% | 7% | 1% | |
| 19 | POLEBOYINA Amrit | 1% | 13% | 35% | 36% | 13% | 1% | |
| 20 | SUN Henry | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 37% | 12% | |
| 21 | ZHANG Julian | 1% | 11% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 3% | |
| 22 | HOLMES Alexiy | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 6% |
| 23 | ZHAO Ryan | - | - | 4% | 18% | 38% | 33% | 7% |
| 24 | CHOU-ESTEBAN Pau | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 1% | |
| 25 | TANG Royce | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 26% | 7% | |
| 26 | GLICKSBERG Alexander | 4% | 22% | 38% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
| 27 | JAZWINSKI Ryan | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 40% | 19% | 3% |
| 28 | SONG Enoch | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 29 | SAMUEL Lucas | 6% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | |
| 30 | KIM Aiden | - | 7% | 28% | 39% | 21% | 4% | |
| 31 | LIANG Haojia | 24% | 41% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 32 | KIAYIAS Alexander | 1% | 11% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 33 | REN Ryan | 3% | 20% | 40% | 29% | 7% | 1% | |
| 34 | KINGSLEY Griffin | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 35 | XU Ryan | 11% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | |
| 36 | SHAW eric | 11% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 37 | DIAZ Gabriel | 1% | 11% | 32% | 38% | 16% | 2% | |
| 38 | BAS Jonathan | 8% | 38% | 37% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 39 | REYES Yannik | 2% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 40 | RAJAT Rivaan | 50% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 41 | CHEN Kevin | 48% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 42 | SCHEURER Edwin | 7% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 43 | CHENG Karter | 5% | 30% | 43% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 44 | INSERRO Luca | 6% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 45 | CHOI Hunter | 12% | 33% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - | |
| 46 | HUANG Jinyao | 4% | 22% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% | |
| 47 | SMITH Colin | 27% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 48 | HUANG Marcus | 43% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 49 | SANTHOSH Rithwik | 10% | 36% | 37% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 50 | LEONG Samuel | 1% | 10% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 50 | COULTER Zachary | 19% | 38% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 52 | SIELSKI Evan | 9% | 35% | 37% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 52 | KAYE Ben | 5% | 22% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% | |
| 54 | MINOR Payson | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 4% | |
| 55 | BRADFORD-WATT Ezra | 59% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
| 56 | KHAW-BRIOT Kai | 38% | 43% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
| 57 | CONVERSO-PARSONS Alexander | 11% | 42% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.