Factory 220 - Passaic, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CHA James | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 49% | |
| 2 | TARCHICHI Robby | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 53% | 13% |
| 3 | XU Nathan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 21% | |
| 3 | HAN Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 33% | |
| 5 | XIE Jicheng | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 36% |
| 6 | LEE Charles T | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 22% | |
| 7 | JIMENEZ Naveen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 53% |
| 8 | KUO Phineas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 14% | |
| 9 | KIM Daniel | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 13% | 1% |
| 10 | MARTIRE Luca | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 17% | |
| 11 | METZ Mason | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 19% | |
| 12 | WONG Jacob W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 30% | |
| 13 | PARKER Isaiah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 40% |
| 14 | LEE Thomas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 52% | 15% | 2% |
| 15 | OH Joshua | 100% | 99% | 87% | 53% | 17% | 2% | |
| 16 | ONIK Ari N. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 29% | 5% | |
| 17 | BAI Austin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 46% | |
| 18 | ZHENG Austin | 100% | 96% | 73% | 33% | 7% | 1% | |
| 19 | POLEBOYINA Amrit | 100% | 99% | 86% | 51% | 15% | 1% | |
| 20 | SUN Henry | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 12% | |
| 21 | ZHANG Julian | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 23% | 3% | |
| 22 | HOLMES Alexiy | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 31% | 6% |
| 23 | ZHAO Ryan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 40% | 7% |
| 24 | CHOU-ESTEBAN Pau | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 14% | 1% | |
| 25 | TANG Royce | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 31% | 6% | |
| 26 | GLICKSBERG Alexander | 100% | 96% | 73% | 35% | 9% | 1% | |
| 27 | JAZWINSKI Ryan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 62% | 22% | 3% |
| 28 | SONG Enoch | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 29 | SAMUEL Lucas | 100% | 94% | 71% | 35% | 9% | 1% | |
| 30 | KIM Aiden | 100% | 100% | 92% | 64% | 25% | 4% | |
| 31 | LIANG Haojia | 100% | 76% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 32 | KIAYIAS Alexander | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 33 | REN Ryan | 100% | 97% | 77% | 37% | 8% | 1% | |
| 34 | KINGSLEY Griffin | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 39% | 12% | 1% |
| 35 | XU Ryan | 100% | 89% | 57% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 36 | SHAW eric | 100% | 89% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 37 | DIAZ Gabriel | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 18% | 2% | |
| 38 | BAS Jonathan | 100% | 92% | 54% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 39 | REYES Yannik | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 40 | RAJAT Rivaan | 100% | 50% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 41 | CHEN Kevin | 100% | 52% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 42 | SCHEURER Edwin | 100% | 93% | 64% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 43 | CHENG Karter | 100% | 95% | 65% | 22% | 3% | - | - |
| 44 | INSERRO Luca | 100% | 94% | 71% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 45 | CHOI Hunter | 100% | 88% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 46 | HUANG Jinyao | 100% | 96% | 74% | 37% | 10% | 1% | |
| 47 | SMITH Colin | 100% | 73% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 48 | HUANG Marcus | 100% | 57% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 49 | SANTHOSH Rithwik | 100% | 90% | 54% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 50 | LEONG Samuel | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 50 | COULTER Zachary | 100% | 81% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 52 | SIELSKI Evan | 100% | 91% | 55% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 52 | KAYE Ben | 100% | 95% | 74% | 37% | 10% | 1% | |
| 54 | MINOR Payson | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 23% | 4% | |
| 55 | BRADFORD-WATT Ezra | 100% | 41% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
| 56 | KHAW-BRIOT Kai | 100% | 62% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
| 57 | CONVERSO-PARSONS Alexander | 100% | 89% | 47% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.