Rockland Community College, Eugene Levy Field House - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LUO Alexander | - | - | - | 2% | 22% | 76% | |
| 2 | CHEN Evan | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 41% | 35% |
| 3 | MADRIGAL SALVAT Guillermo | - | 1% | 4% | 16% | 32% | 33% | 14% |
| 3 | CHIANG William | - | - | 2% | 9% | 26% | 39% | 24% |
| 5 | ARMSTRONG Payson | - | - | 3% | 13% | 32% | 36% | 16% |
| 6 | CHEN Aiden | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 21% | |
| 7 | KO Ethan | 1% | 7% | 20% | 32% | 27% | 12% | 2% |
| 8 | FANG Charlie | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 17% | |
| 9 | NOOL Aaron | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 17% | |
| 10 | JIN Noah | - | 2% | 10% | 24% | 33% | 24% | 7% |
| 11 | SCHLUBACH Jasper | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 4% |
| 12 | ZHENG Jasper | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 13% | |
| 13 | SON Isaac | 3% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% | |
| 14 | GUJJA Rishabh | - | - | 2% | 14% | 40% | 39% | 5% |
| 15 | DAI Jason | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 6% |
| 16 | IVANOV Andrew | 1% | 5% | 19% | 32% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
| 17 | TANG Luke | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 7% |
| 18 | HOREMIOTIS Bennett | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 9% |
| 19 | ZHANG Jacob | 1% | 7% | 21% | 31% | 26% | 12% | 2% |
| 20 | MASKIN Mikhail | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 13% | |
| 21 | JEONG Joseph | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 43% | 40% |
| 22 | YOU Emmanuel | 3% | 15% | 30% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 23 | LEE Asher | 2% | 10% | 26% | 32% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 24 | GREGORY Milo | 21% | 41% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 25 | CHEN Daniel | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 11% | |
| 26 | LI Jayden | 4% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% | |
| 27 | LAI Jayden | - | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 33% | 12% |
| 28 | CHEN Regis | 2% | 11% | 26% | 32% | 21% | 7% | 1% |
| 28 | JAISING Kian | 1% | 6% | 19% | 31% | 28% | 13% | 2% |
| 30 | LAW Benjamin | 2% | 9% | 24% | 32% | 23% | 9% | 1% |
| 31 | YIN Xiangheng | 6% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 7% | - | |
| 32 | LITVINOVSKY Benjamin | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 4% | |
| 33 | YU MAXIMILIAN | 6% | 24% | 34% | 25% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 34 | DUDDA Kavin | 2% | 14% | 33% | 35% | 14% | 1% | |
| 35 | KIM Brendan | 14% | 34% | 33% | 15% | 4% | - | - |
| 36 | MAURAIS JP | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% |
| 37 | LUO Sebastian | - | 5% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
| 38 | NG Remy | 2% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 4% | |
| 39 | NOVAK Luke | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% |
| 40 | MILLER Brodrick | 8% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 41 | LAI Jaxon | 1% | 9% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 42 | ZHANG Renkui | 4% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 43 | LEE Taeryum | 4% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 10% | 1% | |
| 44 | GORE Noah | 8% | 30% | 38% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 45 | KOVAC Blake | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% | |
| 46 | ZHANG Leo | 11% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 47 | YANTZ Stosh | 31% | 42% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | |
| 48 | HWANG Chase | 2% | 12% | 27% | 31% | 20% | 7% | 1% |
| 49 | KWON Ryan | 8% | 26% | 34% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 50 | ZHU David | 6% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 7% | - | |
| 51 | LI Sean | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 5% |
| 52 | LIU FREDERICK | - | 5% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 53 | TANG Jayce | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 54 | YADAV Aarav | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 55 | AU Wesley | 20% | 40% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 56 | CARPENTER Taisei | 16% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 57 | BEZRODNOV Artemi | 1% | 8% | 26% | 38% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 58 | FLANAGAN Ronan | 19% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 59 | LEE Jack | 7% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
| 60 | YAN Milan | 13% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 61 | CHARNA Luca | 23% | 41% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 62 | GOOD Adam | 27% | 41% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 63 | HWANG Christopher | 17% | 38% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 64 | YUAN Leonardo | 6% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 65 | YANTZ Rhys | 4% | 19% | 34% | 28% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 66 | SON Joshua | 5% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% | |
| 68 | HERIGSTAD Daniel | 5% | 19% | 32% | 28% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 69 | ZHU Kingsley | 4% | 16% | 30% | 29% | 16% | 4% | 1% |
| 70 | EICHELBERGER Luke | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 3% |
| 71 | BHATT Shivam | 14% | 37% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 72 | SALA John | 1% | 9% | 24% | 33% | 24% | 9% | 1% |
| 73 | LIM Shane | 6% | 22% | 34% | 25% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 74 | CAVALLARO Xavier | 5% | 20% | 33% | 27% | 12% | 3% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.