Rockland Community College, Eugene Levy Field House - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LUO Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | |
| 2 | CHEN Evan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 35% |
| 3 | MADRIGAL SALVAT Guillermo | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 79% | 47% | 14% |
| 3 | CHIANG William | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 24% |
| 5 | ARMSTRONG Payson | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 16% |
| 6 | CHEN Aiden | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 21% | |
| 7 | KO Ethan | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 40% | 13% | 2% |
| 8 | FANG Charlie | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 17% | |
| 9 | NOOL Aaron | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 17% | |
| 10 | JIN Noah | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 64% | 31% | 7% |
| 11 | SCHLUBACH Jasper | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 55% | 22% | 4% |
| 12 | ZHENG Jasper | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 13% | |
| 13 | SON Isaac | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 15% | 2% | |
| 14 | GUJJA Rishabh | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 44% | 5% |
| 15 | DAI Jason | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 30% | 6% |
| 16 | IVANOV Andrew | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
| 17 | TANG Luke | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 36% | 7% |
| 18 | HOREMIOTIS Bennett | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 38% | 9% |
| 19 | ZHANG Jacob | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 40% | 14% | 2% |
| 20 | MASKIN Mikhail | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 13% | |
| 21 | JEONG Joseph | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 40% |
| 22 | YOU Emmanuel | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 23 | LEE Asher | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 24 | GREGORY Milo | 100% | 79% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 25 | CHEN Daniel | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 11% | |
| 26 | LI Jayden | 100% | 96% | 75% | 40% | 12% | 1% | |
| 27 | LAI Jayden | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 45% | 12% |
| 28 | CHEN Regis | 100% | 98% | 87% | 61% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
| 28 | JAISING Kian | 100% | 99% | 93% | 74% | 43% | 15% | 2% |
| 30 | LAW Benjamin | 100% | 98% | 89% | 65% | 34% | 10% | 1% |
| 31 | YIN Xiangheng | 100% | 94% | 70% | 33% | 7% | - | |
| 32 | LITVINOVSKY Benjamin | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 23% | 4% | |
| 33 | YU MAXIMILIAN | 100% | 94% | 70% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 34 | DUDDA Kavin | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 15% | 1% | |
| 35 | KIM Brendan | 100% | 86% | 52% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 36 | MAURAIS JP | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 31% | 7% |
| 37 | LUO Sebastian | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
| 38 | NG Remy | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 22% | 4% | |
| 39 | NOVAK Luke | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 49% | 17% | 3% |
| 40 | MILLER Brodrick | 100% | 92% | 67% | 33% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 41 | LAI Jaxon | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 42 | ZHANG Renkui | 100% | 96% | 75% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 43 | LEE Taeryum | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 10% | 1% | |
| 44 | GORE Noah | 100% | 92% | 62% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 45 | KOVAC Blake | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 31% | 6% | |
| 46 | ZHANG Leo | 100% | 89% | 57% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 47 | YANTZ Stosh | 100% | 69% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 48 | HWANG Chase | 100% | 98% | 85% | 59% | 28% | 8% | 1% |
| 49 | KWON Ryan | 100% | 92% | 66% | 32% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 50 | ZHU David | 100% | 94% | 70% | 32% | 7% | - | |
| 51 | LI Sean | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 28% | 5% |
| 52 | LIU FREDERICK | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
| 53 | TANG Jayce | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 54 | YADAV Aarav | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 55 | AU Wesley | 100% | 80% | 40% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 56 | CARPENTER Taisei | 100% | 84% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 57 | BEZRODNOV Artemi | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 58 | FLANAGAN Ronan | 100% | 81% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 59 | LEE Jack | 100% | 93% | 66% | 28% | 6% | 1% | |
| 60 | YAN Milan | 100% | 87% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 61 | CHARNA Luca | 100% | 77% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 62 | GOOD Adam | 100% | 73% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 63 | HWANG Christopher | 100% | 83% | 45% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 64 | YUAN Leonardo | 100% | 94% | 72% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 65 | YANTZ Rhys | 100% | 96% | 76% | 43% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 66 | SON Joshua | 100% | 95% | 71% | 33% | 8% | 1% | |
| 68 | HERIGSTAD Daniel | 100% | 95% | 77% | 45% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 69 | ZHU Kingsley | 100% | 96% | 80% | 50% | 21% | 5% | 1% |
| 70 | EICHELBERGER Luke | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 55% | 22% | 3% |
| 71 | BHATT Shivam | 100% | 86% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 72 | SALA John | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 34% | 10% | 1% |
| 73 | LIM Shane | 100% | 94% | 72% | 38% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 74 | CAVALLARO Xavier | 100% | 95% | 75% | 43% | 15% | 3% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.