Rockland Community College, Eugene Levy Field House - Suffern, NY, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | ZUCKER Noah L. | V V V V D V | V V V V V | 5.0 | 5 | - |
| 2 | WHEELER Daniel | V V V D V V | V V V V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
| 3 | SNIDER Jeffrey H. | V V D V V | V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 3 | BARTLETT Jonathan R. | V V D V V D | V V V D | 4.9 | 4 | -0.9 |
| 6 | PHO Eric | V V V V V | V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 7 | YAKIMENKO Andrei | D V V V V | V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 8 | DREYER Matthew W. | D V D V V | V V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 9 | HEKMAT Sina R. | V V V V V V | V D | 2.9 | 6 | +3.1 |
| 10 | CARTER Austin L. | V V V V V | V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 11 | SWICK Kerry J. | V V D V D | V D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
| 12 | CHU Brandon A. | D D V V V | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 12 | SUN Kang | V V V V D D | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 14 | FIEDERLEIN Andrew M. | D V V V D | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 15 | COETZEE Frans M. | V D V V D | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 16 | BUSH Thomas | V D V V D | V | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 17 | VIEDERMAN Matthew (Matt) | V V D D V | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 18 | LEE Kevin | D V V V D V | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 19 | PIERRO Roger | V V D V D | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 20 | GREENBAUM Isaac | D V V D V | D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
| 21 | ANDERSON Eric | V V D D D | D | 0.9 | 2 | +1.1 |
| 22 | CHIANG Andrew | V D D V V | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 23 | WALTING Paul J. | D D D V V V | D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 24 | NEMAZIE David A. | D D D V V | D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 25 | WARD Carrington R. | V D V V D | V D | 1.5 | 3 | +1.5 |
| 26 | COTLAR Andrew D. | V D V D D V | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 27 | KOKENGE Chad | V V D D D | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 28 | RUGGLES William R. | D D D D V V | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 29 | GAO "George" Xiaojiang | D D V D D | V | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 30 | LIU Kun | D D D D D | V D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 31 | ROUSE Joseph (Joe) T. | D D D D V D | D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
| 32 | LABRECQUE Gary F. | D V D D D D | V D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 33 | TARDIFF Seth | D D D V V D | D | 0.5 | 2 | +1.5 |
| 35 | WHITELOCK James R. | D D V D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 36 | MEAGHER Roderick | D D D D V | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 37 | MERCURE Edward (Tony) | D D V D D D | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 38 | MALLOY Christopher B. | D V D D D D | D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
| 39 | LUNIEVICZ Joseph P. | D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
| 40 | CHANG Tung-Shan (Fritz) | D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.