Prime F. Osborn III Convention Center - Jacksonville, FL, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | CLICK Aiden | - | - | - | - | 3% | 28% | 69% |
2 | CORBIN Bennett | - | - | 3% | 17% | 44% | 36% | |
3 | ROMERO KURI Carlos Alexander | - | - | 1% | 11% | 42% | 46% | |
3 | LIDSKY Phineas | 2% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 14% | ||
5 | SAUNIER Cameron | - | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 46% | 21% |
6 | MIZRAHI Michael | - | - | 4% | 18% | 42% | 35% | |
7 | ZAHRAN Aiden | 1% | 12% | 47% | 34% | 6% | ||
8 | CLICK Tristan | - | - | 7% | 31% | 46% | 16% | |
9 | HU Robert J. | - | - | 8% | 39% | 52% | ||
10 | LEE DoWon | - | 4% | 24% | 45% | 24% | 4% | |
11 | DAVIDENKO Alexander | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 42% | 27% | |
12 | JOHNSON Soren | 1% | 17% | 38% | 32% | 11% | 1% | |
13 | SIMMES Jackson | - | - | 3% | 16% | 40% | 35% | 6% |
14 | CHA Patrick | - | 5% | 31% | 49% | 16% | ||
15 | LEE Winston | - | 3% | 18% | 38% | 32% | 8% | |
16 | NAM Nathaniel | 21% | 46% | 27% | 6% | - | - | |
17 | ALI Farhan | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 23% | 2% |
18 | EVANS George | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
19 | OSBORN Hunter | 1% | 10% | 31% | 40% | 18% | ||
20 | YI Nathan | 1% | 8% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 5% | |
21 | NOLAN Tyler | 3% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
22 | DINKINS Adam | 1% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 3% | |
23 | WANG Marcus | 3% | 20% | 42% | 28% | 7% | 1% | |
25 | MUMMIDI Rishi | - | 3% | 17% | 40% | 33% | 8% | |
26 | ZHOU alex | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
27 | JEONG Arisu | 7% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 4% | ||
28 | KIM Joshua | 8% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 4% | ||
29 | MITTELSTAEDT Isaiah | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 5% | - |
30 | ALVIOR Jonathan Adrian | 5% | 25% | 39% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
31 | JIANG Harry | 9% | 33% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
32 | WATERS Nathaniel | 25% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | ||
33 | RAPALSKI Thomas | - | 10% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 3% | |
34 | RVACHEV Michael | 2% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% | |
35 | NGUYEN Hubert | - | 2% | 13% | 37% | 38% | 11% | |
36 | SLATTERY Kaden | 1% | 17% | 38% | 32% | 11% | 1% | |
37 | SHILOV Maxim | 1% | 15% | 44% | 31% | 7% | - | |
38 | CREMONA Diego Maria | 1% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 3% | |
39 | VENZON Gavin | 27% | 54% | 17% | 2% | - | ||
40 | BATISTA Julian | 16% | 51% | 27% | 5% | - | - | |
41 | DELONG Joshua | 2% | 14% | 35% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - |
42 | SHTEYNBLIK Michael | 13% | 34% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
43 | MENON Rahul | 32% | 43% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
44 | STRAFFORD Andrew | 51% | 42% | 7% | - | - | ||
45 | KARLEKAR Veer | 61% | 32% | 6% | 1% | - | - | |
46 | BOHLER-PARK Henry | 39% | 44% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
47 | SIGG Noah | 59% | 35% | 5% | - | - | - | |
48 | HAM Ian | 81% | 18% | 1% | - | - | - | |
49 | WONG Sebastian | 2% | 13% | 29% | 32% | 18% | 5% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.