Prime F. Osborn III Convention Center - Jacksonville, FL, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | CLICK Aiden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 69% |
2 | CORBIN Bennett | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 36% | |
3 | ROMERO KURI Carlos Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 46% | |
3 | LIDSKY Phineas | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 14% | ||
5 | SAUNIER Cameron | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 21% |
6 | MIZRAHI Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 35% | |
7 | ZAHRAN Aiden | 100% | 99% | 87% | 40% | 6% | ||
8 | CLICK Tristan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 62% | 16% | |
9 | HU Robert J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 91% | 52% | ||
10 | LEE DoWon | 100% | 100% | 96% | 72% | 27% | 4% | |
11 | DAVIDENKO Alexander | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 27% | |
12 | JOHNSON Soren | 100% | 99% | 82% | 43% | 12% | 1% | |
13 | SIMMES Jackson | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 41% | 6% |
14 | CHA Patrick | 100% | 100% | 95% | 64% | 16% | ||
15 | LEE Winston | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 41% | 8% | |
16 | NAM Nathaniel | 100% | 79% | 33% | 6% | - | - | |
17 | ALI Farhan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 25% | 2% |
18 | EVANS George | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 20% | 3% |
19 | OSBORN Hunter | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 18% | ||
20 | YI Nathan | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 27% | 5% | |
21 | NOLAN Tyler | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 20% | 4% | - |
22 | DINKINS Adam | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 21% | 3% | |
23 | WANG Marcus | 100% | 97% | 77% | 35% | 8% | 1% | |
25 | MUMMIDI Rishi | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 41% | 8% | |
26 | ZHOU alex | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
27 | JEONG Arisu | 100% | 93% | 66% | 27% | 4% | ||
28 | KIM Joshua | 100% | 92% | 62% | 24% | 4% | ||
29 | MITTELSTAEDT Isaiah | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 24% | 5% | - |
30 | ALVIOR Jonathan Adrian | 100% | 95% | 70% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
31 | JIANG Harry | 100% | 91% | 58% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
32 | WATERS Nathaniel | 100% | 75% | 33% | 8% | 1% | ||
33 | RAPALSKI Thomas | 100% | 100% | 89% | 58% | 21% | 3% | |
34 | RVACHEV Michael | 100% | 98% | 82% | 47% | 15% | 2% | |
35 | NGUYEN Hubert | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 49% | 11% | |
36 | SLATTERY Kaden | 100% | 99% | 82% | 44% | 12% | 1% | |
37 | SHILOV Maxim | 100% | 99% | 83% | 39% | 8% | - | |
38 | CREMONA Diego Maria | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 21% | 3% | |
39 | VENZON Gavin | 100% | 73% | 19% | 2% | - | ||
40 | BATISTA Julian | 100% | 84% | 33% | 5% | - | - | |
41 | DELONG Joshua | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 15% | 2% | - |
42 | SHTEYNBLIK Michael | 100% | 87% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
43 | MENON Rahul | 100% | 68% | 25% | 4% | - | - | - |
44 | STRAFFORD Andrew | 100% | 49% | 7% | - | - | ||
45 | KARLEKAR Veer | 100% | 39% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
46 | BOHLER-PARK Henry | 100% | 61% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
47 | SIGG Noah | 100% | 41% | 6% | - | - | - | |
48 | HAM Ian | 100% | 19% | 2% | - | - | - | |
49 | WONG Sebastian | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 24% | 5% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.