John T. Rhodes Sport Center - Myrtle Beach, SC, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ROSE-JONES Simon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% |
| 2 | CLICK Tristan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 53% | 14% |
| 3 | MUNLIN Donovan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 53% |
| 3 | CHUNG Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 30% |
| 5 | SO Lorenzo | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 31% | 6% |
| 6 | ZHU Yiming | 100% | 95% | 71% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 7 | LEE Aiden | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 34% | 7% |
| 8 | OLIVERIUS Joseph W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 40% |
| 9 | DAVIDENKO Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 23% |
| 10 | TIKHONOV Ilia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 18% |
| 10 | LEE Anton | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 12 | AYOTTE James | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 32% | 7% | - |
| 13 | RACHEL Dylan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 50% | 10% |
| 14 | PHILLIPS Jeffrey T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 33% |
| 15 | RUSSELL James | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 24% | 4% |
| 16 | UNZHAKOV Konstantin | 100% | 95% | 71% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 17 | CHEN Wesley | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 48% | 13% |
| 18 | NGUYEN Hubert | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 12% |
| 19 | HAN Sam | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 26% | 4% |
| 20 | TIKHONOV Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 28% |
| 21 | CHANEY Charles | 100% | 85% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 22 | NUDELMAN Aleksandr | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 34% | 6% |
| 22 | LEECH Braedan | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 24 | DILDA Griffin | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 25 | BAYUS Oliver | 100% | 64% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 26 | ALEXANDER Jacksen | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 38% | 9% | - |
| 27 | ROBERTS Phoenix | 100% | 97% | 76% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 28 | TIEMANN Landen | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 25% | 4% |
| 29 | DAVIS Jack | 100% | 85% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 30 | JEONG Arisu | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 16% | 2% |
| 31 | RAMEY Daylon | 100% | 84% | 40% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 32 | NARANJO Andrew | 100% | 92% | 64% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 33 | ALVIOR Jacob A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 21% |
| 34 | MARISI Gabriel | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 17% | 1% |
| 35 | EDGECOMB Michael J. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 11% | 1% |
| 36 | HALE Bradley | 100% | 73% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 37 | KIM Jeff | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 54% | 17% | 2% |
| 38 | MORET Eric N. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 2% |
| 39 | KONG Brandon | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 40 | ZHANG Lucas | 100% | 98% | 80% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 41 | CHAN Ian | 100% | 56% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 42 | NOLAN Tyler | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 43 | REDDY Daksh | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 13% | - |
| 44 | LEE Christopher | 100% | 95% | 69% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 45 | EVANS George | 100% | 95% | 72% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 46 | SHIVELY Cole T. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 46 | TANEJA ARNAV | 100% | 62% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 48 | JONES Jackson | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 49 | SLOTER Lewis E. | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 50 | SCORDINSKY Liam | 100% | 68% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 51 | JARRATT Isaac | 100% | 80% | 36% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 52 | ZHOU alex | 100% | 95% | 72% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 53 | MALONE Jacob | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 54 | BROSNAN Solomon | 100% | 56% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 54 | NAGANO Jonathan | 100% | 89% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 56 | MOONEY Liam | 100% | 78% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.