Northwest Fencing Center - Beaverton, OR, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | LANGE Henry C. | - | - | 4% | 22% | 45% | 30% | |
2 | LARSEN Samuel F. | - | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% |
3 | JAKLITSCH Michael (Mike) T. | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 6% |
3 | MCGAW Julian E. | - | 1% | 12% | 34% | 38% | 15% | |
5 | BENACK Steven M. | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 40% | 22% | 4% |
6 | FELKER Jared L. | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 30% | 9% |
7 | FAUBERT Andy C. | - | - | 1% | 13% | 49% | 37% | |
8 | MUNLIN Donovan | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 37% | 13% | |
9 | ZAFFT Maximo S. | - | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 9% |
10 | NEAL Henry | 2% | 17% | 41% | 33% | 7% | < 1% | - |
11 | FERGUSON Ross A. | - | 4% | 22% | 41% | 28% | 5% | |
12 | BENACK Mark | 8% | 34% | 43% | 15% | 1% | - | |
13 | YU Colin | - | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 13% |
14 | SHOREY David P. | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 4% |
15 | ROY Joseph T. | - | 6% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 6% | |
16 | LEI Jacob | - | 4% | 23% | 40% | 27% | 6% | |
17 | BEITTEL Chloe F. | - | 4% | 17% | 31% | 30% | 15% | 3% |
18 | BODON Michele I. | - | 8% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 6% | |
19 | LEI Joshua | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 33% | 12% | |
20 | CHU Audrey | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 2% |
21 | DUCHOW Benjamin W. | - | 7% | 27% | 41% | 22% | 2% | |
22 | ZUHARS Renee A. | 4% | 20% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 2% | |
23 | DUCHOW Henry M. | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% | |
24 | RUSSELL Renata | 2% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% | |
25 | DUCHOW Matthew D. | - | 4% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% |
26 | HINMAN Andrew | 4% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
27 | COPELAN Maria A. | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 1% | |
27 | CHOI Isaac | 3% | 18% | 38% | 32% | 9% | - | |
29 | FERGUSON William | 5% | 31% | 42% | 19% | 3% | - | |
30 | PARKER Emilie Rose (Rosie) | 1% | 9% | 24% | 33% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
31 | LAI Coby | 11% | 40% | 40% | 8% | 1% | - | |
32 | LLOYD Alex | 7% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
33 | BARNES Olivia R. | 11% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 5% | - | |
34 | FLESHER Daniel J. | 1% | 13% | 39% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
35 | MCFARLAND Kai | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
36 | SKIFFINGTON Sam | 13% | 42% | 37% | 8% | - | - | |
37 | JACOBUS Curran | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
38 | MCGAW Maia | 10% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
39 | GULLO Kenji Y. | 36% | 49% | 14% | 1% | - | - | |
40 | SHERTZ Kira E. | 7% | 30% | 39% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
41 | DUAN Jenny S. | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | |
42 | PERRIGO Ben | 5% | 27% | 41% | 23% | 3% | - | |
43 | SCHMUGAR Brooke | 12% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
44 | GOLDEN Danielle | 10% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - | |
45 | PROKOPEAS Grace | 8% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.