Freehold Fencing - October Open Foil

Senior Mixed Foil

Sunday, October 19, 2025 at 9:30 AM

Freehold Fencing Academy - Freehold, NJ, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 HORSLEY Asherah 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 83% 39%
2 MILLER Dillon 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 79% 33%
3 PETERS Nathan M. 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 91% 35%
3 PECK Quinn 100% 100% 100% 97% 83% 48% 11%
5 JANNEY Jonathan 100% 100% 99% 94% 71% 26%
6 POLEBOYINA Amrit 100% 99% 94% 72% 34% 7% -
7 THOMAS Liam 100% 100% 97% 82% 47% 14% 2%
8 BLACK Zachary 100% 100% 100% 95% 73% 27%
9 DEEB Adam 100% 100% 100% 100% 92% 56%
10 ASCIONED'ELIA Adam I. 100% 100% 100% 99% 94% 72% 31%
11 LEONG Samuel 100% 99% 93% 68% 30% 5% -
12 BELOKON Sammy 100% 100% 98% 84% 50% 16% 2%
13 ZHANG Ethan 100% 98% 83% 46% 11% 1%
14 EZEKIEL Nathan 100% 97% 77% 36% 7% -
15 CHENG Karter 100% 70% 27% 5% - -
16 KURPASKA Jonathan A. 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 79% 30%
17 SHICK Veronika 100% 100% 94% 68% 27% 4%
18 MCENTEE Owen 100% 100% 93% 66% 22% 1%
19 VISHNEVSKY Aden 100% 98% 81% 44% 11% - -
20 ZHANG Julian 100% 95% 71% 33% 8% 1% -
21 BEKIYANTS Elizabeth 100% 86% 47% 14% 2% -
22 SANTHOSH Rithwik 100% 93% 67% 29% 7% 1% -
23 PEREZ Logan 100% 100% 84% 46% 13% 2% -
24 SIELSKI Evan 100% 61% 20% 3% - - -
25 XU Lucas 100% 84% 45% 13% 2% - -
26 ROJAS Elijah 100% 99% 86% 50% 13% 1%
27 SEETOO David 100% 62% 18% 2% - -
28 KUO Phineas 100% 99% 91% 64% 26% 4% -
29 MURPHY Damian J. 100% 98% 83% 48% 15% 2% -
30 WARD Evan 100% 86% 50% 17% 3% - -
31 LAZAR Carolina 100% 87% 50% 17% 3% -
32 LAU Winston 100% 84% 45% 13% 2% - -
33 GANDHI Anjali 100% 61% 9% 1% - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.