Freehold Fencing Academy - Freehold, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | HORSLEY Asherah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 39% |
2 | MILLER Dillon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 33% |
3 | PETERS Nathan M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 35% |
3 | PECK Quinn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 48% | 11% |
5 | JANNEY Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 26% | |
6 | POLEBOYINA Amrit | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 34% | 7% | - |
7 | THOMAS Liam | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 14% | 2% |
8 | BLACK Zachary | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 27% | |
9 | DEEB Adam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 56% | |
10 | ASCIONED'ELIA Adam I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 31% |
11 | LEONG Samuel | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 30% | 5% | - |
12 | BELOKON Sammy | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 16% | 2% |
13 | ZHANG Ethan | 100% | 98% | 83% | 46% | 11% | 1% | |
14 | EZEKIEL Nathan | 100% | 97% | 77% | 36% | 7% | - | |
15 | CHENG Karter | 100% | 70% | 27% | 5% | - | - | |
16 | KURPASKA Jonathan A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 30% |
17 | SHICK Veronika | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 27% | 4% | |
18 | MCENTEE Owen | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 22% | 1% | |
19 | VISHNEVSKY Aden | 100% | 98% | 81% | 44% | 11% | - | - |
20 | ZHANG Julian | 100% | 95% | 71% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
21 | BEKIYANTS Elizabeth | 100% | 86% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | |
22 | SANTHOSH Rithwik | 100% | 93% | 67% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
23 | PEREZ Logan | 100% | 100% | 84% | 46% | 13% | 2% | - |
24 | SIELSKI Evan | 100% | 61% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
25 | XU Lucas | 100% | 84% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
26 | ROJAS Elijah | 100% | 99% | 86% | 50% | 13% | 1% | |
27 | SEETOO David | 100% | 62% | 18% | 2% | - | - | |
28 | KUO Phineas | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 26% | 4% | - |
29 | MURPHY Damian J. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - |
30 | WARD Evan | 100% | 86% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
31 | LAZAR Carolina | 100% | 87% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - | |
32 | LAU Winston | 100% | 84% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
33 | GANDHI Anjali | 100% | 61% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.