Thousand Oaks, CA - Thousand Oaks, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LA ROSA Federico | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 46% | 10% | |
| 2 | FUNK Theo S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 34% | 7% |
| 3 | JEON Alexander E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 34% |
| 3 | CATLIN Adam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 47% | 10% |
| 5 | HONG Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 28% |
| 6 | NGUYEN Jett | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 38% |
| 7 | TOBIN Ryan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 24% |
| 8 | WILKENS Zach Q. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 19% | 2% | - |
| 9 | PROUTY Nicholas C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 27% | |
| 10 | SCHENCK Theo | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 55% | 22% | 4% |
| 11 | WONG Anthony M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 44% |
| 12 | GIRALDO Pablo E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 26% | 4% |
| 13 | HO Justin | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 14 | NGUYEN Nish | 100% | 97% | 82% | 52% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 15 | WHARTON Zachary | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 16 | FORTNER Lance R. | 100% | 100% | 91% | 63% | 26% | 4% | |
| 17 | OH Jonathan | 100% | 98% | 81% | 43% | 12% | 1% | |
| 18 | MORALES Ian N. | 100% | 96% | 67% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 19 | MEINHOLD Li | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
| 20 | KUMBLA Samarth | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 28% |
| 21 | HSIUNG Richie | 100% | 97% | 81% | 50% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 22 | XIAO Edward | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 18% | 2% | - |
| 23 | WU Conrad J. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 23 | BARTEL Jacob L. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 49% | 18% | 3% |
| 25 | PIESNER Joshua C. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 44% | 15% | 2% |
| 26 | KIM Aaron J. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 52% | 20% | 3% |
| 27 | MCCOSH Evin M. | 100% | 95% | 63% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 28 | CHENG Matthew S. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 28 | LAMBRECHT Julius | 100% | 88% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 30 | HODESS Ethan | 100% | 98% | 76% | 37% | 9% | 1% | |
| 31 | ARNOLD Oscar A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 38% | 9% |
| 32 | GOLDADE Luke A. | 100% | 31% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 33 | LUNA Emilio | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 34 | LEE David Y. | 100% | 93% | 68% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 35 | WONG Luke S. | 100% | 95% | 71% | 30% | 6% | - | - |
| 36 | SELIVANOV Adam | 100% | 87% | 51% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 37 | WOMACH Tristan | 100% | 59% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 38 | MASCARI DUMONT Alexandre | 100% | 75% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 39 | MA Jonas(zhao long) | 100% | 56% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 40 | HOBSON Aaron K. | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 41 | LYMAN Finnian S. | 100% | 80% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.