San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | BANERJEE Anup | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 70% |
| 2 | DANKAR Neel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 50% | |
| 3 | DIERKS Kian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 35% | |
| 3 | LO Conrad | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 84% |
| 5 | NG Eben S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 49% | 8% |
| 6 | CHIRASHNYA Adam | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 74% | 32% | |
| 7 | WOO Christian | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 48% | 12% | |
| 8 | SUNG Chang-Han S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 52% | 15% |
| 9 | CHUANG Kian J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 37% | |
| 10 | CORTRIGHT Joshua C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 22% | |
| 11 | MA Andrew | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 32% | 5% | |
| 12 | DETERING Julian | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 16% | |
| 13 | ZHANG Jiening G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 21% |
| 14 | KIM Ryan Y. | 100% | 98% | 79% | 38% | 9% | 1% | |
| 15 | KANG Anthony Jaegu | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 10% | |
| 16 | SMITH Grant D. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 16% | 2% | |
| 17 | FINNEY Lorenz | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 31% | 6% | - |
| 18 | MU Jeffrey | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 26% | 4% | |
| 19 | BAEK David | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 18% | |
| 20 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 48% | 16% | 2% |
| 21 | CHIN Ryan | 100% | 100% | 93% | 65% | 23% | 2% | - |
| 22 | LYNCH Owen C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 53% | 9% |
| 23 | HOSKERI Anik S. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 33% | 7% | |
| 24 | TEH Ryan | 100% | 87% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 25 | YEE Johnathan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 35% | 6% | |
| 26 | KHER Roan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 39% | 7% | |
| 27 | CHOPRA Rohan A. | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 28 | COELHO Cristiano P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 65% |
| 29 | WANG Ethan | 100% | 96% | 75% | 39% | 10% | 1% | |
| 30 | VALOUEV Aleksey | 100% | 82% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 31 | BAO Aaron | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 45% | 11% | 1% |
| 32 | UPENDER Sky | 100% | 37% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 33 | HARRIS Otto | 100% | 88% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 34 | YU Leo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 62% | 7% |
| 35 | HUSSAIN Ibrahim | 100% | 93% | 68% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 36 | WHITE Austin M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 47% | 11% | |
| 37 | LIN Richard | 100% | 88% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 38 | WACHTEL Oliver | 100% | 71% | 25% | 4% | - | - | |
| 39 | RAINS Jackson T. | 100% | 91% | 56% | 18% | 2% | - | - |
| 40 | HUSSAIN Ismail A. | 100% | 96% | 71% | 30% | 6% | - | - |
| 41 | NG Kenneth | 100% | 89% | 56% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 42 | AIKEN Nicholas A. | 100% | 96% | 74% | 35% | 9% | 1% | |
| 43 | WU Lucas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 53% | 13% | |
| 44 | CHENG Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 69% | 28% | 4% | |
| 45 | CHEN Justin K. | 100% | 94% | 66% | 26% | 4% | - | |
| 46 | CHEN Evan | 100% | 95% | 72% | 35% | 9% | 1% | |
| 47 | CHASTAINE Ryan L. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 48 | RANJITH Yash M. | 100% | 92% | 64% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 49 | LEVY Jacob | 100% | 99% | 84% | 48% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 50 | BUFIY Aeneas | 100% | 82% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 51 | LLIDO Soren | 100% | 90% | 50% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 52 | CHU Colin | 100% | 81% | 20% | 2% | - | - | |
| 53 | ZENG Chuyi | 100% | 84% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 54 | MAK Osman K. | 100% | 93% | 57% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 55 | BARTELS Milo | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 45% | 9% | - |
| 55 | MA Bryant | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 57 | LI Jett | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 58 | FANG Jaden | 100% | 90% | 60% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
| 59 | ANDERSON Jacob | 100% | 82% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 60 | MYERS Dean | 100% | 67% | 24% | 4% | - | - | |
| 61 | RUBIN Max | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 24% | 3% | |
| 61 | GERA Kaveer | 100% | 30% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 63 | SISINNI Riccardo | 100% | 43% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 64 | ZHANG Luke | 100% | 53% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.