Prime Fencing Academy - Dublin, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CHEN Owen | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 32% |
| 2 | WEI Winston | - | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 41% | 20% |
| 3 | DOUGLASS Liam | - | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 36% | 16% |
| 3 | GANAPATHI Eshan | - | - | 2% | 13% | 39% | 42% | 4% |
| 5 | AGARWAL Savya | - | - | - | 1% | 13% | 49% | 37% |
| 6 | CHAN Joseph | - | - | 5% | 22% | 43% | 30% | |
| 7 | BURAGOHAIN Aiden | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 9% | - |
| 8 | MA Isabelle | - | - | 1% | 5% | 24% | 44% | 26% |
| 9 | CHETWANI naman | 3% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 10 | HOQUE Raiden | 1% | 10% | 30% | 37% | 18% | 3% | |
| 11 | SAFTA Aidan | - | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 45% | 20% |
| 12 | YEE Colin | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 48% | 35% |
| 13 | JUNG Aaron | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 14 | KONCHENKO Ilya | - | - | - | 5% | 27% | 45% | 23% |
| 15 | MATTUPALLI Ashwika | 1% | 8% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
| 16 | ASSAO Neil | 5% | 25% | 40% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 17 | HERNANDEZ Jonathan | 1% | 10% | 30% | 37% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 18 | LI Chelsea | 1% | 12% | 51% | 31% | 6% | - | |
| 19 | NGUYEN VAN Constantin | - | 6% | 32% | 40% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 20 | URSU Oana M. | 39% | 47% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 21 | GARCIA Carter | - | 13% | 34% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 22 | RENGANATHAN Krithiga | 7% | 45% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 23 | LEE Linus | 3% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 24 | WEI Roger | - | 4% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
| 25 | MASOOD Rohail | - | 1% | 13% | 35% | 36% | 13% | 1% |
| 26 | VENKATRAMAN Anirudh | - | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 27 | HUANG Barron | 1% | 12% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 28 | KUMAR Anika | 8% | 38% | 38% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 29 | KOLBASSOV Matvey | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 5% |
| 30 | FERREYRA Emilio | 2% | 21% | 40% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 31 | WILLIAMS Matthew | - | 4% | 21% | 40% | 30% | 6% | - |
| 32 | FANG Elliott | 1% | 11% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 33 | MAQSOOD Minnah | 1% | 7% | 28% | 43% | 19% | 2% | |
| 34 | CHENG Maxwell | 21% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 35 | VUNDAVALLY Ria | 16% | 36% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 36 | GUPTA Pearl | 5% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 37 | RASTOGI Saiansh | 9% | 33% | 38% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 38 | BAINDLA Rushil | < 1% | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
| 39 | SIDES Kyle | 7% | 36% | 38% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 40 | KAAKATI Noor | 58% | 35% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 41 | WONG Iris | 47% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.