Prime Fencing Academy - Dublin, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CHEN Owen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 32% |
| 2 | WEI Winston | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 20% |
| 3 | DOUGLASS Liam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 16% |
| 3 | GANAPATHI Eshan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 46% | 4% |
| 5 | AGARWAL Savya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 37% |
| 6 | CHAN Joseph | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 30% | |
| 7 | BURAGOHAIN Aiden | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 10% | - |
| 8 | MA Isabelle | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 26% |
| 9 | CHETWANI naman | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 13% | 1% | - |
| 10 | HOQUE Raiden | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 21% | 3% | |
| 11 | SAFTA Aidan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 20% |
| 12 | YEE Colin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 35% |
| 13 | JUNG Aaron | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 14 | KONCHENKO Ilya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 68% | 23% |
| 15 | MATTUPALLI Ashwika | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
| 16 | ASSAO Neil | 100% | 95% | 70% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 17 | HERNANDEZ Jonathan | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 21% | 3% | - |
| 18 | LI Chelsea | 100% | 99% | 87% | 36% | 6% | - | |
| 19 | NGUYEN VAN Constantin | 100% | 100% | 94% | 62% | 22% | 3% | - |
| 20 | URSU Oana M. | 100% | 61% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 21 | GARCIA Carter | 100% | 100% | 87% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 22 | RENGANATHAN Krithiga | 100% | 93% | 48% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 23 | LEE Linus | 100% | 97% | 78% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 24 | WEI Roger | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 9% | 1% |
| 25 | MASOOD Rohail | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 51% | 14% | 1% |
| 26 | VENKATRAMAN Anirudh | 100% | 100% | 93% | 67% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 27 | HUANG Barron | 100% | 99% | 87% | 56% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 28 | KUMAR Anika | 100% | 92% | 54% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 29 | KOLBASSOV Matvey | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 31% | 5% |
| 30 | FERREYRA Emilio | 100% | 98% | 77% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 31 | WILLIAMS Matthew | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 36% | 6% | - |
| 32 | FANG Elliott | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 33 | MAQSOOD Minnah | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 21% | 2% | |
| 34 | CHENG Maxwell | 100% | 79% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 35 | VUNDAVALLY Ria | 100% | 84% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 36 | GUPTA Pearl | 100% | 95% | 72% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 37 | RASTOGI Saiansh | 100% | 91% | 58% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
| 38 | BAINDLA Rushil | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 40% | 13% | 2% |
| 39 | SIDES Kyle | 100% | 93% | 57% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 40 | KAAKATI Noor | 100% | 42% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
| 41 | WONG Iris | 100% | 53% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.