Thrust Fall RYC/RJCC

Y-14 Men's Foil

Sunday, October 26, 2025 at 8:00 AM

Rockland Community College (Eugene Levy Field House) - Suffern, NY, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 SIMONOV Timofey 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 91%
2 ZHAI Derrick 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 85% 46%
3 WEI JR Shan 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 85% 41%
3 WANG Mendy 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 89% 52%
5 CZARNECKI Thomas 100% 100% 100% 99% 91% 54%
6 HART-SYED declan 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 83% 44%
7 KIM Daniel 100% 100% 99% 94% 72% 30%
8 KAYE Ben 100% 100% 93% 71% 35% 9% 1%
9 PLUMMER Waylon 100% 100% 100% 98% 75% 19%
10 XU Ryan 100% 99% 94% 73% 37% 8%
11 GRIGORIEV Michael 100% 100% 99% 95% 76% 40% 8%
12 GLICKSBERG Alexander 100% 100% 98% 88% 61% 25% 4%
13 ZHUANG Disheng (Eddie) 100% 100% 100% 97% 82% 43% 8%
14 AYYAGARI Abhiram 100% 100% 98% 86% 55% 19% 2%
15 NABASSOUA Djibril 100% 100% 100% 99% 94% 65% 19%
16 HU Weijie 100% 99% 91% 67% 33% 9% 1%
17 XIAN kevin 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 87% 48%
18 CHANG Parker 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 86% 48%
19 ULYSSE Jacob 100% 100% 98% 86% 57% 19% 1%
20 CHOI Hunter 100% 100% 100% 94% 62% 17%
21 SHEN Lucas 100% 99% 91% 55% 15% 1%
22 CAO Joshua 100% 100% 97% 84% 52% 16%
23 WU Wallace 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 87% 47%
24 HU Michael 100% 100% 100% 97% 81% 40% 7%
25 TANG Michael 100% 98% 81% 46% 15% 2% -
26 ZHANG Ethan 100% 100% 99% 89% 61% 23% 3%
27 SHAW Eric 100% 99% 94% 74% 41% 13% 1%
28 JAZWINSKI Ryan 100% 100% 100% 99% 83% 38%
29 ZHENG Vincent 100% 90% 59% 24% 5% -
30 QIAN Will 100% 100% 97% 84% 53% 18% 2%
31 KIM Albert 100% 86% 45% 10% 1% -
32 CHAE Thomas Woojin 100% 45% 10% 1% - - -
33 BEYDOUN Sam 100% 100% 99% 92% 53% 12%
34 CHENG Karter 100% 100% 93% 65% 24% 4% -
35 YAVENDITTI William 100% 100% 100% 94% 68% 16%
36 HUANG Jinyao 100% 99% 91% 63% 26% 4%
37 LIN Qianzhong 100% 99% 93% 71% 38% 11% 1%
38 BRADFORD-WATT Ezra 100% 86% 50% 17% 3% - -
39 AHMAD Uzayr 100% 100% 100% 96% 77% 32% 5%
40 FREL Vincent 100% 100% 97% 83% 52% 18% 2%
41 DENG Jonathan 100% 100% 96% 68% 23% 2%
42 CHEN Kevin 100% 89% 55% 17% 2% -
43 BAS Jonathan 100% 99% 94% 73% 38% 10% 1%
44 YANG CHENLE 100% 100% 98% 88% 60% 24% 3%
45 LEE Aeden 100% 96% 75% 42% 14% 2% -
46 RAJAT Rivaan 100% 96% 76% 37% 8% 1% -
47 CHONG Cooper 100% 81% 44% 14% 2% - -
48 RAY Callum 100% 95% 73% 38% 11% 1% -
49 KEEGAN Cole 100% 97% 82% 50% 18% 3%
50 ZHENG Austin 100% 100% 99% 90% 54% 11%
51 AMR HOSSNY Adam 100% 99% 92% 67% 29% 5%
52 MA Matthew 100% 100% 98% 86% 55% 19% 2%
53 XIA Vincent 100% 98% 85% 55% 21% 3% -
54 SHINDE Aksh 100% 71% 30% 7% 1% - -
55 LEE Ryan 100% 91% 49% 13% 1% - -
56 DAVIDSON Henry 100% 82% 43% 13% 2% - -
57 GUGALA Frank 100% 99% 88% 57% 21% 3%
58 PLOSSER Charlie 100% 87% 52% 19% 4% -
59 MOON Nolan 100% 95% 72% 37% 10% 1% -
60 REN Ryan 100% 99% 93% 72% 37% 9% -
61 CONVERSO-PARSONS Alexander 100% 99% 82% 41% 10% 1% -
62 WANG Jaaziel 100% 97% 78% 41% 13% 2% -
63 YANG Luca 100% 97% 82% 50% 18% 3%
63 WONG Maxwell 100% 84% 44% 11% 1% -
65 DAVE Neil 100% 94% 67% 27% 5% - -
66 DAWSON Myer 100% 88% 53% 18% 3% -
67 VAN DER HARTEN Lukas 100% 72% 24% 3% - -
68 HUANG Marcus 100% 94% 67% 29% 7% 1% -
69 LIU jeremy 100% 98% 85% 56% 24% 5% -
70 WU Max 100% 98% 86% 55% 22% 4% -
71 DEGRYSE Leopold 100% 84% 46% 14% 2% - -
72 NAYAK Saideep 100% 57% 10% 1% - -
73 BHOSREKAR Som 100% 73% 26% 3% - -
74 IM Andrew 100% 68% 25% 5% - -
75 STILES Sumner 100% 99% 92% 65% 26% 3%
76 MAN Dylan 100% 93% 66% 30% 8% 1% -
77 SIELSKI Evan 100% 98% 86% 56% 22% 4% -
78 YEUNG rex 100% 73% 30% 6% - - -
79 HAN Jiaren 100% 99% 88% 60% 25% 5% -
80 CHUN Owen 100% 90% 56% 19% 3% - -
81 XU Jonathan 100% 81% 44% 15% 3% - -
82 LIU Kunshuo 100% 89% 50% 10% 1% -
83 SHARMA Ari 100% 98% 86% 55% 21% 4% -
84 WEBSTER Rowan 100% 66% 15% 1% - -
85 BHATTACHARYA Dhruv 100% 36% 5% - - - -
86 FANG Ryan 100% 77% 35% 8% 1% - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.