Santa Clara Convention Center - Santa Clara, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | PARK Sangwook | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 48% |
| 2 | TANG Zheng | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 40% | 12% | 2% |
| 3 | LU Jacob | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 46% |
| 3 | GACIOCH Noah | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 30% | |
| 5 | CHEN Ryan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 35% | 7% |
| 6 | LOUIE Joseph | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 32% | 6% |
| 7 | MUENKE Magnus | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 37% |
| 8 | ENG Kyler | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 9 | WU Steven | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 58% |
| 10 | NIKIFOROV Timofei | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 22% | |
| 11 | TANG Michael | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 39% | 12% | 2% |
| 12 | SCHWARTZMAN Ethan | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 13 | VAN JAARSVELD Leo | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 48% | 11% | |
| 14 | RONG Marcus | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 41% | 13% | 1% |
| 15 | KIM Daniel | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 44% | 14% | 1% |
| 16 | MEHROTRA Neel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 27% |
| 17 | ZHANG Kwan Fei(Albert) | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 21% | |
| 18 | KLINKNER Richard | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 8% | |
| 19 | DEVINENI Avyang | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 17% | 2% |
| 20 | MOSLEY Wally | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 21% | 3% | |
| 21 | PARKE Nathaniel | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 9% | |
| 21 | ZHANG Austin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 32% | 5% |
| 23 | PARKER Isaiah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 52% |
| 24 | YAO Tristan | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 25 | QIAO James | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 36% | 8% | 1% |
| 26 | SU Samuel | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 30% | 6% |
| 27 | LI Grayson | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 36% | 7% |
| 28 | FU Nolan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 12% | |
| 29 | LEUNG Dylan | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 7% | |
| 30 | WONG Aaron | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 15% | 2% | |
| 31 | SRINIVASAN Sanat Ram | 100% | 97% | 80% | 42% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 32 | SZETO Zachary | 100% | 83% | 27% | 4% | - | - | |
| 33 | GOWDA Suyog | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 17% | |
| 34 | CHU Ted | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 34% | |
| 35 | GUO Luke | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 36 | ADDLEMAN Joshua | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 41% |
| 37 | HERNDON Liam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 50% | 15% |
| 38 | PIVOVAROV Lucas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 36% | |
| 39 | KOU Mason | 100% | 94% | 66% | 28% | 6% | - | |
| 40 | YILMAZ Tarik | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 12% | |
| 41 | ZHANG Chaoyi（Joey） | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
| 42 | WAGHOLIKAR Prathit | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 43 | AVETISIAN Michael | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 44% | 14% | 1% |
| 43 | KROTZ Nicolas | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
| 45 | DU Evan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 48% | 11% |
| 46 | WANG Devin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 79% | 46% | 13% |
| 47 | MA Nolan | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
| 48 | PAI Marcus | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 24% | 4% | |
| 49 | PARRA Lucas | 100% | 100% | 94% | 64% | 23% | 3% | |
| 50 | SCHWITZER Eliot | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 57% | 24% | 4% |
| 51 | YU Brandon | 100% | 84% | 46% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 52 | PETKOV Keean | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 24% | 4% |
| 53 | FUNG SHAUN | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
| 54 | ZHANG Luqi | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 13% | 2% | |
| 55 | DENG Henry | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 11% | |
| 56 | RONG Gordon | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 60% | 20% | |
| 57 | TAMAYO-SARVER Daniel | 100% | 81% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 57 | LEE Leo | 100% | 93% | 65% | 28% | 6% | - | |
| 59 | TOPPING Axel | 100% | 84% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 60 | HU Jingsen | 100% | 93% | 67% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 61 | BAUMAN Colin | 100% | 96% | 75% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 62 | KIM Remington | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 31% | 5% | |
| 63 | MOU Jaydon | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 10% | 1% |
| 64 | WOO Lucas | 100% | 99% | 86% | 49% | 14% | 2% | |
| 65 | CHANG Matthew | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 56% | 19% | 2% |
| 66 | KHUSHRAJ Rohan | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 67 | LIN Daniel | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 13% | 2% | |
| 68 | HSU Joshua | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 30% | |
| 69 | MARTIN Lucas | 100% | 92% | 64% | 27% | 6% | - | |
| 70 | LIU Xuyao | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 16% | 2% | |
| 71 | LIU Max | 100% | 94% | 69% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 72 | XUE Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 38% | 6% |
| 73 | LEE Damien | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 15% | 2% |
| 74 | BROWN Korbyn | 100% | 100% | 97% | 75% | 33% | 6% | |
| 75 | MENG Haoyi | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 15% | 2% | |
| 76 | DENG Andes | 100% | 68% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
| 76 | REYES Landon | 100% | 86% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 78 | SHIN Ryan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 38% | 9% |
| 79 | FUNG SCOTT | 100% | 73% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 80 | LUO Alvin Y. | 100% | 81% | 41% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 81 | LIU Daniel | 100% | 89% | 58% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 82 | MARTIN zachary | 100% | 95% | 72% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 83 | PARSA Rayan | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 84 | XIE HanZhang (Elon) | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 85 | SONG Jonathan | 100% | 76% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 86 | KIM Julian | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 17% | 2% | |
| 87 | OR Anson | 100% | 71% | 24% | 4% | - | - | |
| 88 | LI Sean | 100% | 82% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 89 | DIESSNER Henry | 100% | 84% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 90 | NGUYEN Ethan V. | 100% | 85% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 91 | LU Ian | 100% | 86% | 52% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 92 | BUENAVENTURA Camden | 100% | 92% | 64% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 93 | WANG Juehan | 100% | 90% | 59% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 94 | WU MiEr | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 95 | QIU William | 100% | 74% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 95 | LAU Caleb | 100% | 78% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 97 | YU Haoyun | 100% | 72% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 99 | OLIVAS Joseph | 100% | 96% | 75% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 100 | WLOKA Erik | 100% | 63% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
| 101 | LIN Bryan | 100% | 84% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 102 | ABRAHAM Aaron | 100% | 69% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 103 | LOUIE Kyle | 100% | 35% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 104 | ZENG Felix | 100% | 82% | 45% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 105 | YUN Nicholas | 100% | 76% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 106 | AYDIN Kaan | 100% | 98% | 73% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.