Denver, CO - Denver, CO, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | NIEBERGALL Colin G. | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 10% |
| 2 | KOFROTH Zachary R. | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
| 3 | DIECK Logan O. | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% |
| 3 | WALSH Kevin | 7% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 5 | DUONG Enoch | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% |
| 6 | JUNG Alexander | - | 2% | 10% | 24% | 33% | 24% | 7% |
| 7 | CHON Joshua | 7% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 7 | ALAIMO Charles | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 4% |
| 9 | KAJI Ty | - | 4% | 15% | 29% | 31% | 17% | 4% |
| 10 | BRISLAWN Reilly R. | - | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 39% | 21% |
| 11 | LATIF IMRAN ZAKARIYYA | - | - | 4% | 15% | 32% | 34% | 14% |
| 12 | FARQUHARSON Cole | - | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 39% | 21% |
| 13 | KOPPE Alexander | 6% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 14 | SMITH Jackson | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% |
| 15 | LOGUE Ethan D. | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 30% | 10% |
| 16 | STRAUSS Luke | 2% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 17 | ALVAREZ Ian T. | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% | 1% |
| 18 | GOLDMAN Rami | 1% | 5% | 17% | 31% | 30% | 14% | 3% |
| 19 | LEVITSKY Jonathan | 1% | 7% | 20% | 32% | 27% | 12% | 2% |
| 20 | KOPPE Benjamin | 20% | 40% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 21 | LOGUE Andrew E. | 4% | 18% | 31% | 29% | 14% | 4% | - |
| 22 | KIM PAUL | 1% | 8% | 23% | 34% | 24% | 9% | 1% |
| 23 | SOLTER Kai | 8% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 24 | EBELL Ivan D. | 6% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 8% | 2% | - |
| 25 | COFFEY Jacob | 15% | 35% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 26 | COMER Alexander J. | 4% | 17% | 31% | 29% | 15% | 4% | - |
| 27 | LI Patrick | 11% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 28 | LOU Kevin | 19% | 40% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.