MSA Fieldhouse - GRAND RAPIDS, MI, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MUMMANENI Samyuta | - | - | - | 6% | 33% | 61% | |
| 2 | SONG Jenna | - | - | 6% | 24% | 43% | 26% | |
| 3 | HUSSIAN Annabelle | - | 2% | 15% | 40% | 36% | 7% | |
| 3 | AADHI Hansika | - | - | - | - | 5% | 29% | 66% |
| 5 | URDANETA LARGURA Sylvia | 1% | 8% | 28% | 42% | 22% | ||
| 6 | KNAPP Isabella | 2% | 15% | 36% | 36% | 12% | ||
| 7 | CULLIVAN Sienna | - | - | 5% | 24% | 45% | 26% | |
| 8 | OS Danielle | - | 5% | 25% | 43% | 24% | 3% | |
| 9 | HOROWITZ Shuli | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 42% | 21% | |
| 10 | SALMI-BYDALEK Ada | - | 5% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 7% | - |
| 11 | ZOLDAN Gweniveve A. | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 41% | 17% | |
| 12 | SHUSTA Lily | 1% | 20% | 42% | 29% | 8% | 1% | |
| 13 | DIRKES Catherine | 1% | 6% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% | |
| 14 | LIN Kenzie | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 40% | 22% | 3% |
| 15 | BLAKEY Heaven | 1% | 7% | 27% | 40% | 21% | 4% | |
| 16 | NAFSOU Ava | 11% | 37% | 37% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 17 | TAN Dorathy | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 45% | 24% | |
| 18 | YU Angela | 27% | 42% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 19 | XIONG Isabel | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 39% | 21% | 2% |
| 20 | GOLLNICK Mira | - | 2% | 15% | 37% | 35% | 11% | |
| 21 | KHAN Leena | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% | |
| 22 | TAYLOR-OSBORN Nadia | 6% | 28% | 40% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 23 | HARRIS Parker | - | 1% | 12% | 35% | 38% | 14% | |
| 24 | MORSE Katherine | 1% | 14% | 38% | 34% | 12% | 1% | |
| 25 | CHOI JULIE | 4% | 23% | 39% | 27% | 6% | ||
| 26 | CAMPBELL June | - | 6% | 26% | 40% | 24% | 5% | |
| 27 | SONG Erin | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 10% | |
| 28 | DHALIWAL Seerat | 3% | 22% | 42% | 27% | 6% | - | |
| 28 | LEGGETT Emilia | 7% | 38% | 39% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 30 | WOERTER Therese-Margaret | 13% | 36% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 31 | KOSCIK-AQUINO Emily | 14% | 43% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 32 | LEMASTERS Elise M. | 30% | 43% | 22% | 5% | - | ||
| 33 | FECHER Lily | 1% | 12% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 34 | COLLINS Anna | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 9% | |
| 35 | CHUNG Stella | 2% | 29% | 42% | 21% | 5% | - | |
| 36 | YARLAGADDA Smaya | 43% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
| 37 | SUN Yixuan | 30% | 44% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 38 | WANG Xiaolan | 9% | 33% | 38% | 17% | 3% | ||
| 39 | LIN Aria | 85% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 40 | VINS Katherine | 67% | 29% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 41 | REDEMANN Reagan | 24% | 46% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 42 | KRONZER Sophia | 37% | 43% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.