MSA Fieldhouse - GRAND RAPIDS, MI, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MUMMANENI Samyuta | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 61% | |
| 2 | SONG Jenna | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 26% | |
| 3 | HUSSIAN Annabelle | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 42% | 7% | |
| 3 | AADHI Hansika | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 66% |
| 5 | URDANETA LARGURA Sylvia | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 22% | ||
| 6 | KNAPP Isabella | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 12% | ||
| 7 | CULLIVAN Sienna | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 26% | |
| 8 | OS Danielle | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 27% | 3% | |
| 9 | HOROWITZ Shuli | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 21% | |
| 10 | SALMI-BYDALEK Ada | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 33% | 7% | - |
| 11 | ZOLDAN Gweniveve A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 17% | |
| 12 | SHUSTA Lily | 100% | 99% | 79% | 38% | 9% | 1% | |
| 13 | DIRKES Catherine | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 34% | 7% | |
| 14 | LIN Kenzie | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 25% | 3% |
| 15 | BLAKEY Heaven | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 25% | 4% | |
| 16 | NAFSOU Ava | 100% | 89% | 53% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 17 | TAN Dorathy | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 69% | 24% | |
| 18 | YU Angela | 100% | 73% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 19 | XIONG Isabel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 23% | 2% |
| 20 | GOLLNICK Mira | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 46% | 11% | |
| 21 | KHAN Leena | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 27% | 5% | |
| 22 | TAYLOR-OSBORN Nadia | 100% | 94% | 66% | 26% | 5% | - | |
| 23 | HARRIS Parker | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 14% | |
| 24 | MORSE Katherine | 100% | 99% | 85% | 47% | 13% | 1% | |
| 25 | CHOI JULIE | 100% | 96% | 73% | 34% | 6% | ||
| 26 | CAMPBELL June | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 28% | 5% | |
| 27 | SONG Erin | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 10% | |
| 28 | DHALIWAL Seerat | 100% | 97% | 75% | 33% | 6% | - | |
| 28 | LEGGETT Emilia | 100% | 93% | 56% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 30 | WOERTER Therese-Margaret | 100% | 87% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 31 | KOSCIK-AQUINO Emily | 100% | 86% | 43% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 32 | LEMASTERS Elise M. | 100% | 70% | 27% | 5% | - | ||
| 33 | FECHER Lily | 100% | 99% | 87% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 34 | COLLINS Anna | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 9% | |
| 35 | CHUNG Stella | 100% | 98% | 69% | 26% | 5% | - | |
| 36 | YARLAGADDA Smaya | 100% | 57% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 37 | SUN Yixuan | 100% | 70% | 26% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 38 | WANG Xiaolan | 100% | 91% | 58% | 20% | 3% | ||
| 39 | LIN Aria | 100% | 15% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 40 | VINS Katherine | 100% | 33% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 41 | REDEMANN Reagan | 100% | 76% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 42 | KRONZER Sophia | 100% | 63% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.