November NAC

Cadet Men's Saber

Sunday, November 16, 2025 at 9:00 AM

Fort Worth Convention Center - Fort Worth, TX, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 CHON Collin - - - - 5% 32% 63%
2 CHUNG Connor - - - - 5% 30% 64%
3 SKARBONKIEWICZ Maksymilian A. - - - 1% 11% 40% 47%
3 HUANG Alex F. - - - - 2% 20% 78%
5 TSE Aiden J - - - 6% 34% 59%
6 ERMAKOV Semeon - - - - 4% 31% 65%
7 WANG Samuel - - - 1% 10% 39% 50%
8 KIM ELIJAH - - - 2% 12% 39% 46%
9 YANG Phillip - - 1% 5% 22% 42% 30%
10 LIN Maxim - - - 1% 7% 33% 59%
11 ANTHONY Devyn V. - - - - 3% 23% 74%
11 WEI Rian - - 2% 11% 31% 39% 18%
13 BROENING-CHAI Jonas - - 4% 20% 39% 30% 6%
14 VAID Luke - - - 1% 9% 37% 53%
15 GONZALEZ Jake - - - 1% 11% 40% 48%
16 TANI Tino - - 4% 18% 36% 32% 10%
17 KIM Ethan - - - - 4% 28% 68%
18 HWANG Jayden - - - 1% 11% 39% 49%
19 ANAND Rishab - - 2% 11% 32% 39% 16%
19 WANG Daniel - - - 1% 11% 39% 49%
21 ZHAO Lucas - - - 2% 29% 70%
21 CRICOL Damian - - 4% 21% 44% 31%
23 LEE Brian - - 2% 15% 39% 36% 8%
24 WANG ANDREW CHANG - - - 3% 16% 42% 39%
25 WONG Lucas - - 2% 10% 28% 39% 21%
26 BOLLU Viren - 1% 5% 20% 37% 30% 7%
27 MEYERSON Jacob - 1% 11% 42% 46%
28 MUNGUIA Nathan - - - 2% 13% 40% 45%
29 DAI Zihou - 3% 15% 33% 34% 14% 1%
29 FANG Eason - 4% 19% 37% 29% 9% 1%
31 KANG Matthew - - 2% 13% 35% 39% 11%
32 LIN Philip T. - 5% 27% 49% 19%
33 ANDRES Michael - - - 2% 14% 40% 43%
34 PINTO Marcus - - 1% 8% 27% 42% 23%
35 MATTOO Deven - - - 2% 13% 40% 44%
35 LIU Victor - 1% 8% 26% 38% 23% 4%
37 KOVALEV Daniil N. - - - 1% 9% 37% 54%
38 IYER Neil - 2% 11% 27% 34% 21% 5%
39 HOLZ Lucas - - 1% 6% 24% 44% 26%
40 WANG Will - - - 4% 22% 47% 27%
41 MEHAN Nicholas - - 1% 7% 23% 40% 28%
41 PATEL Rayn - - - 4% 19% 42% 35%
41 LI Howard - - - - 5% 29% 65%
44 LIU Kevin - - 1% 6% 23% 42% 28%
45 BELAND Riley James "RJ" - 4% 17% 36% 31% 10% 1%
46 KHANNA Adamantis - - 1% 9% 32% 47% 11%
47 CAO Oliver - 2% 11% 31% 39% 17%
48 NARDINI Nathanael P. 1% 7% 25% 37% 24% 6%
48 LUCAS William 1% 6% 24% 40% 26% 5%
50 KANG Evan R. - - 1% 10% 38% 51%
51 YIP Shing Chi - - - - < 1% 13% 87%
52 OH Aster - - 1% 8% 27% 42% 22%
53 SUH Leo - 5% 22% 37% 28% 8% -
53 WONG Max - - 3% 17% 38% 34% 8%
55 CAI Jeff - 2% 11% 27% 34% 21% 5%
56 WANG Max - 1% 7% 25% 38% 25% 5%
57 CAO Donald - 2% 18% 42% 32% 5%
58 YOOK Isaac - - 4% 21% 42% 29% 5%
59 HENDERSON Lucas - 1% 10% 31% 41% 16%
60 FAN Hsiao-Kai(Kai) - 1% 8% 30% 41% 18% 1%
61 DOOLEY Atticus - 6% 24% 38% 25% 7% -
62 BAI Evan - - 4% 17% 36% 34% 9%
63 BOSITA Brennan 2% 13% 30% 33% 18% 4% -
64 LAMTAN Christoffer - 1% 8% 26% 38% 22% 4%
65 JOO Jeein - - - 1% 7% 36% 57%
66 PEREIRA Beckham - 1% 7% 27% 39% 22% 4%
67 SO Preston - - - 3% 17% 41% 38%
68 AGARWAAL Yohan - - 4% 18% 36% 32% 9%
69 BARENBOYM Michael - 2% 13% 32% 36% 16% 2%
70 ZHANG Kaixuan - - 2% 25% 47% 25% -
71 ALAVE Kyle - - 5% 22% 41% 27% 5%
71 YI Andrew - 3% 14% 33% 33% 15% 2%
73 CARRINGTON IV William T. - - 1% 9% 33% 45% 12%
74 WANG Alex 1% 8% 23% 33% 25% 9% 1%
75 LIAO Yifong 1% 8% 31% 38% 18% 4% -
76 KIM Kendrick - - 1% 6% 23% 43% 27%
76 LI Yidong A. - 2% 11% 30% 36% 18% 3%
78 BELL III Alfred (Tripp) R. - - 1% 6% 24% 44% 26%
79 SANCHEZ Jacob - - - 3% 18% 46% 33%
79 KITSON Chase - - 1% 8% 28% 41% 21%
81 GREMILLION Obadiah - - - 5% 23% 43% 28%
81 NOVOSYOLOK Zachary - - 2% 10% 30% 40% 18%
83 LI Cooper - 3% 14% 33% 33% 14% 2%
84 SASSI Ilyas - - 3% 18% 42% 33% 3%
84 CLARK Aram - 1% 5% 22% 39% 28% 5%
86 YAP Kah Kai (Cayden) - - 1% 9% 29% 41% 19%
86 ZHAO Royce - - 3% 18% 42% 32% 5%
88 XUE Leo - 3% 15% 34% 34% 13% 1%
89 BIVIJI Ali - 1% 5% 24% 44% 26%
90 CIEMINS Henry 1% 6% 23% 37% 27% 7%
91 CHEN Kevin 7% 29% 38% 21% 4% -
92 AO Christopher - 1% 7% 25% 39% 24% 4%
93 SADHU Neiyam - - 5% 22% 38% 28% 6%
94 PERRIN Leo 3% 15% 31% 31% 16% 4% -
95 STURGEON Cole - - 2% 13% 34% 38% 13%
96 BURKE Sam - 2% 14% 33% 35% 14% 1%
97 JI Johnson - 1% 7% 24% 38% 25% 5%
97 WONG Mac - 5% 22% 38% 26% 8% 1%
97 WONG David - - 3% 17% 39% 34% 7%
100 ZHANG Shaoxuan 2% 12% 29% 33% 19% 5% 1%
101 MIAO Heqi - 4% 18% 35% 31% 11% 1%
101 HUANG Caleb 1% 8% 27% 37% 22% 6% -
103 NAFTALI Ori 5% 25% 41% 24% 5% - -
104 WAXLER Ryan - 1% 5% 18% 35% 33% 9%
104 GREENSTEIN Viktor - - 2% 13% 35% 38% 11%
106 LI Ayden - - 2% 23% 47% 27% 1%
107 ONG Dylan - 1% 10% 30% 38% 19% 2%
108 LIU Yijin 1% 10% 28% 37% 20% 4% -
109 WONG Ron 1% 9% 27% 36% 22% 6% -
110 TRZEPLA Max 4% 19% 34% 29% 12% 2% -
111 BIAN Hongyu - 1% 6% 24% 42% 27%
112 SANGSTER Arden - 1% 8% 27% 40% 23%
113 LIU Leyi - - 2% 17% 62% 20%
114 BALU Aedan 3% 17% 36% 31% 12% 2%
115 WONG Hawken 2% 16% 35% 32% 13% 2%
116 AN Chris 49% 40% 10% 1% -
117 SUN Andrew 1% 8% 27% 37% 22% 5%
118 GONG Alex - - 1% 9% 28% 41% 21%
119 BRIMMER Robert (Trey) - - 4% 18% 36% 32% 9%
120 KOZLOFF Wyatt - 1% 8% 28% 39% 21% 3%
121 LIU Ethan - 2% 14% 33% 33% 15% 2%
122 PORTER Dupree - 1% 5% 21% 38% 29% 7%
123 HO Anson - 5% 21% 38% 29% 7% -
124 LIU Aaron - 1% 11% 33% 39% 15% 1%
125 CHAN Henry - 2% 13% 33% 35% 15% 2%
125 WANG Matthew - 4% 20% 36% 29% 10% 1%
127 SONG Aidan 1% 11% 30% 35% 18% 4% -
128 KU Collin 4% 22% 38% 27% 9% 1%
129 LEE Brady - - 4% 19% 39% 32% 5%
130 KARAVAS Nicholas - 5% 18% 34% 30% 12% 1%
131 ROH Jaden 8% 30% 38% 20% 5% -
132 KWON Kenneth - 1% 5% 20% 38% 29% 6%
133 FENG Brendan - 3% 15% 32% 33% 15% 1%
134 MERMEGAS Alexander 1% 11% 28% 34% 20% 5% -
135 SU Kingston - 5% 23% 43% 24% 4% -
136 LIANG Morgan 1% 10% 28% 35% 21% 5% -
137 CHEN Cooper - 5% 20% 36% 28% 10% 1%
138 GUREWICH Benjamin - - 4% 31% 44% 19% 1%
139 NAIR Sujit 1% 8% 26% 37% 23% 6% -
140 LIN Brendan - 4% 20% 37% 29% 9% 1%
141 MINASIAN Mason - 2% 14% 33% 34% 14% 2%
142 LAU Kyrus 3% 19% 35% 29% 12% 2% -
144 LUAN Mark 1% 7% 26% 39% 23% 4%
145 CHAMBERS Miles - 1% 10% 30% 40% 18%
146 LIN Ethan 1% 14% 39% 39% 6% -
147 NGO Maximus - 1% 6% 25% 44% 24%
148 GU Andrew 2% 13% 34% 35% 14% 2%
148 NAMBIAR Navin 3% 17% 37% 31% 11% 1%
150 WANG Tiger - 6% 23% 37% 26% 7%
151 SRIVATS Vedh - - 4% 22% 42% 28% 4%
152 SALMAN Hamzah - 5% 19% 35% 30% 10% 1%
153 KHOTLINE Daniel 1% 10% 29% 36% 20% 5% -
154 SHEYNZON Benjamin 2% 18% 38% 30% 10% 1% -
155 ROBINSON Ezra 12% 35% 34% 15% 3% - -
156 PAK Andrew 2% 21% 43% 28% 6% - -
157 YU Jayden - 4% 18% 34% 30% 11% 1%
157 SUN Andy 4% 19% 33% 29% 12% 2% -
159 MCDONALD Finn - - 5% 22% 38% 28% 7%
159 IDIR Mohand-Ilyas - 2% 18% 42% 32% 5%
161 WANG Ryan 19% 41% 29% 9% 1% - -
162 BREUER Daniel - 3% 16% 36% 32% 12% 1%
163 PADANILAM Thomas 3% 18% 36% 30% 11% 2% -
164 LIU Guanyu 1% 11% 31% 35% 17% 3% -
165 LEE Nathan Uju - 2% 13% 31% 35% 16% 3%
165 CHANG Ethan 1% 8% 27% 37% 22% 6% 1%
167 GATTO Enzo P. 19% 38% 30% 12% 2% - -
167 KIM Enoch 10% 40% 35% 12% 2% - -
169 GORDON Samuel - 4% 20% 36% 28% 9% 1%
170 MELE Gianni 3% 18% 35% 30% 12% 2% -
170 CAI Limo 54% 36% 8% 1% - - -
172 KANG Jeremy - 1% 9% 28% 38% 21% 3%
173 YEAZEL Colin 16% 42% 32% 9% 1% - -
174 SLAVNOV Anton - 8% 31% 39% 18% 3% -
174 GRIGORIEV Roman - 2% 14% 34% 34% 13% 1%
176 LIU Daniel 4% 18% 34% 30% 13% 2% -
177 HALL Noah 2% 18% 42% 30% 7% -
177 LUC Linkin - 5% 22% 40% 27% 6% -
179 DIXON Allan 15% 38% 33% 12% 2% - -
180 SUBA Mason 24% 49% 23% 4% - -
181 SAGE Nikolai - 4% 18% 37% 31% 9% 1%
182 HAO Johnny 6% 25% 38% 24% 6% 1% -
182 SUN Ryan 2% 14% 32% 33% 16% 3% -
184 VINTFELD Liam - - 4% 20% 43% 28% 4%
185 KANG Jayden 9% 36% 40% 14% 1% -
186 HENRY Cadel 8% 31% 38% 19% 4% -
187 MANNINO Miller 23% 42% 27% 7% 1% -
188 MEADE Liam R. 3% 18% 38% 31% 10% 1%
189 HAIRABEDIAN Ellis 10% 37% 39% 13% 1% -
190 PAUL Jimmy 13% 37% 34% 13% 2% -
191 HWANG Hagan - 5% 22% 38% 27% 8% -
192 KULKARNI Shreyas 8% 30% 37% 20% 5% - -
193 ZLATINSKI Jason - 4% 21% 37% 28% 9% 1%
194 TSAO Alister 2% 13% 32% 33% 16% 3% -
194 KEMP Austin 9% 34% 37% 16% 3% - -
197 MEDVINSKY Daniel - 4% 18% 36% 30% 11% 1%
197 BURGESS Beckham - 3% 14% 33% 34% 15% 1%
199 HE Zhikai (kyle) 1% 13% 34% 34% 15% 3% -
200 BROOKS Drake 3% 20% 38% 29% 9% 1% -
201 CHEN Jack 1% 7% 23% 34% 26% 8% 1%
201 CHEN Shawn 3% 16% 33% 32% 14% 3% -
203 YUEN Caleb 5% 29% 39% 21% 5% 1% -
204 KAMURA Kosei 9% 40% 36% 13% 2% - -
205 HAN Kyle 12% 42% 39% 6% - - -
206 KIM Yusung 1% 7% 26% 38% 23% 5% -
207 FOSTY Jasper 20% 39% 29% 10% 2% - -
207 WANG Theodore - 5% 27% 42% 22% 4% -
209 HORN Diodorus 38% 42% 16% 3% - - -
210 EKAMBARAM Nikhil 3% 16% 31% 30% 16% 4% -
210 KIM Leo 9% 54% 31% 6% - - -
212 WAXLER Alex 28% 42% 23% 6% 1% - -
212 HU Jayden 1% 9% 27% 36% 22% 5% -
214 YANG Jake 41% 43% 14% 2% - - -
215 CHAWLA Abhishek 9% 31% 37% 19% 4% - -
215 CHEN Felix 8% 31% 37% 19% 5% - -
217 SIDDAMSHETTY Ishaan 3% 16% 32% 31% 15% 3% -
218 SRIVATSAV Anay 4% 21% 38% 27% 9% 1% -
219 SHAPIRO Simon - 10% 30% 37% 19% 4% -
219 TOSCANO Sebastian 1% 11% 33% 37% 15% 3% -
221 XIAO Brayden - 5% 19% 33% 29% 12% 2%
222 HU Harry 1% 8% 27% 36% 22% 6% 1%
222 RAJMOHAN Arya - 8% 35% 39% 15% 2% -
222 VO Blake 1% 10% 28% 35% 20% 5% -
225 FERRIS JR. Michael 1% 11% 34% 36% 15% 2% -
226 TANG Morgan - 7% 28% 39% 21% 5% -
227 KUANG Cyrus 27% 42% 24% 6% 1% - -
227 KAPOOR Krish 52% 38% 9% 1% - - -
229 BRISENO Ethan 10% 34% 36% 16% 3% - -
230 BURLA Saiavaneesh 75% 23% 2% - - - -
231 PARK Emerson 14% 45% 31% 9% 1% - -
231 XIE Justin 19% 48% 30% 3% - - -
233 SAYAR Luke 1% 15% 36% 33% 13% 2% -
234 SAHA Aadi 58% 35% 7% - - - -
235 SULLIVAN Gerard 11% 45% 35% 8% 1% - -
236 PARIKH Saavn 10% 41% 36% 12% 2% - -
237 LIU Jayden 17% 41% 31% 10% 1% -
238 VO Landon 4% 26% 45% 22% 3%
239 RINALDI Savio 2% 14% 34% 35% 13% 2%
240 NGO Emerson 16% 47% 31% 6% -
241 SHANKAR Rahm 20% 42% 29% 8% 1% -
242 KANIA Alexander 5% 25% 38% 24% 7% 1%
243 TENG Lucas 40% 41% 16% 3% - -
244 SO Morgan 26% 42% 24% 6% 1% -
244 FISCHER Noel 26% 43% 24% 6% 1% -
246 TURNER Benjamin 2% 12% 31% 34% 17% 4% -
247 D'AMELJ Edoardo 2% 15% 35% 33% 13% 2% -
248 DAWSON-TEECE Powell - 4% 17% 32% 31% 14% 2%
248 ORIE Sohan 8% 28% 35% 21% 6% 1% -
250 LEVIN Jacob 1% 15% 37% 32% 13% 2% -
251 KATZ Nico 29% 41% 23% 6% 1% - -
251 PARK Inwoo 1% 8% 29% 37% 21% 5% -
253 BADMUS Joshua 2% 12% 28% 33% 19% 5% -
254 TASIKAS Peter 11% 31% 34% 19% 5% 1% -
255 RHODES Bryce 59% 34% 6% - - - -
255 LEVY Jack 1% 12% 36% 36% 14% 2% -
257 XIA Matthew 2% 13% 30% 33% 17% 4% -
258 SRIVATSAV Ishaan 1% 15% 35% 33% 13% 2% -
259 SHAPIRO Leo 7% 26% 36% 23% 7% 1% -
259 CAUTHRON Oliver 8% 30% 38% 20% 5% - -
261 ZHANG Caleb 18% 43% 30% 8% 1% - -
261 VISH Manyu 35% 42% 19% 4% - - -
263 ZHANG Aiden 14% 38% 33% 12% 2% - -
264 PANIWALA Atif 30% 43% 21% 5% - - -
264 POLSANI Gaurav 11% 43% 33% 11% 2% - -
266 KUSHKOV Michael 13% 35% 34% 15% 3% - -
267 KONDOGI Saivarun 26% 43% 24% 6% 1% - -
268 CHEN Zhengming 15% 38% 33% 12% 2% - -
269 SOULES-ONO Makoa 4% 20% 35% 29% 11% 2% -
270 TAYCHER Aaron 5% 24% 38% 24% 7% 1% -
271 SRA Nawab 17% 46% 29% 7% 1% - -
271 SMITH Etienne 31% 45% 19% 4% - - -
273 HOLMES Xavier 18% 45% 29% 8% 1% - -
274 TITOV Zachary 4% 38% 40% 15% 2% - -
275 KIM Derek 54% 37% 8% 1% - - -
276 BIVIJI Adam 9% 28% 34% 21% 7% 1% -
277 TANJGA Luka 58% 35% 7% 1% - - -
278 AWAD Omar 27% 46% 22% 4% - - -
279 WOSTER Matthew (Mateo) 23% 42% 27% 7% 1% - -
280 ZEYU wu < 1% 4% 19% 39% 30% 8%
281 SUN Eon 16% 38% 32% 12% 2% - -
282 LYU Tyler 22% 42% 28% 8% 1% -
283 HOWARTH Hayes 28% 43% 23% 6% 1% - -
283 CHAN Troy Devon 13% 37% 34% 14% 3% - -
283 MATTOO Dhruv 2% 18% 41% 29% 9% 1% -
286 BRAMLETT Myer 48% 38% 12% 2% - -
287 QI Jeremy 7% 27% 38% 22% 6% 1% -
288 GARCIA RODRIGUEZ Juan Pablo 43% 40% 15% 3% - - -
289 TAKEBE Ren 9% 37% 37% 14% 3% - -
289 KILLEBREW Morris 78% 21% 1% - - - -
291 COPPA Neal 5% 27% 41% 22% 5% - -
291 CHAVAN Aditya 40% 45% 14% 2% - -
291 WU Vincent 15% 36% 32% 14% 3% - -
291 KIM Suin 7% 31% 38% 19% 5% - -
291 LI Kent 31% 44% 21% 4% - - -
291 ZHU Bob < 1% 4% 22% 40% 27% 6% -
291 ABRAHAM Steve E 36% 43% 18% 3% - - -
298 LIU Andy 39% 43% 15% 2% - -
299 HENDERSON Louis 4% 19% 33% 28% 13% 3% -
299 ZHOU Ruibo 39% 46% 15% 1% - - -
299 SONG Ryan 22% 42% 27% 8% 1% - -
302 HUANG Keon 53% 37% 9% 1% - - -
302 SPENCER-EL Elijah 39% 42% 16% 3% - - -
304 THOTAKURA Sreyas 47% 41% 11% 1% - - -
305 KORIVI Ishan 62% 32% 6% - - - -
305 SAHA Aryan 74% 23% 3% - - - -
305 KONG Victor 56% 36% 7% 1% - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.