Elizabeth B. Searle '74 Athletic Center at Garrison Forest School - Owings Mills, MD, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | LEE Anton | V V V V V D | V V V V V | 5.6 | 5 | -0.6 |
| 2 | FEELY Benjamin | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 3.2 | 6 | +2.8 |
| 3 | YAO Aiden | V V D D V V | V V V V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 3 | MIKHAIL Lucas | V D V V V V | V V V D | 5.1 | 5 | -0.1 |
| 5 | GATEWOOD Michael | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.5 | 6 | +1.5 |
| 6 | YU Jeremy | V V V V V D | V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 7 | BORAN Brooks | V V V D V | V V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 8 | ALPSOY Emir | V D V D V V | V V V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 9 | CHANEY Charles | V V D V V V | V D | 5.3 | 5 | -0.3 |
| 10 | GRIGGS Kaiden | V V V V D V | V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 12 | ZHUKOV Egor | V V D V D V | V V D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
| 13 | GALIOTE James | D V V D V V | V V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 14 | CASH William Li | V D V D V V | V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 15 | DOAN Christopher | D V D V D V | V V D | 4.4 | 3 | -1.4 |
| 16 | HUDSON Declan | D V V D V D | V V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 17 | WANG Marcus | V V V V V D | D | 5.4 | 5 | -0.4 |
| 18 | YAO Ryan | V V V V D V | D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 19 | KUYKENDALL Logan | V D V V V V | V D | 2.5 | 5 | +2.5 |
| 20 | KONG Ethan | D V V V V | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 21 | CHAN Ian | V V D V V V | V D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
| 22 | CHONG Eden | V V D V D V | V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 23 | HUANG Max | D V D V V V | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 24 | LOPATIN Sergei | D V V D V V | V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
| 25 | ZHAO Brandon | D V V V V | V | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
| 26 | LAU LUCAS | D V V V D | V D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
| 27 | CHUNG Daehyun Daniel | D D V V D V | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 28 | PARY Jean Pierre | V D V V D D | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 29 | MAXWELL Taiga | V D D D V | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 30 | STRAFFORD Andrew | D V D D V D | V D | 3.7 | 2 | -1.7 |
| 31 | MEDISETTI Arjun | D D D V D V | V D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 32 | WORMACK Andrew | D V D V D D | V D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 33 | FENG Xinmin | V V D V D | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 34 | SCOTTODIMARCO James | D D V V V | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 35 | GUO Benjamin | V V V D D | D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 36 | KIM Daniel | D V V V D D | D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 37 | SAAD Peter | D V V D D V | D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 38 | SMITH Noah | D D V D V V | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 39 | LI Nolan | D V D D V | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 40 | ZHOU Luke | D V D D D V | D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 41 | FERNANDEZ ZAMBRANA Rafael Lucas | D D V D D V | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 42 | WANG Liam | D V D D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 43 | WEI Jayden | D V D D D D | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 44 | MILLER Xavier | D V D D D D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 45 | FEELY Samuel | D D V D D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 46 | SHULL Matthias | D D D D V D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 47 | PAYE Adam Trevor | V D D D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 47 | BHATT Shivam | D D D V D D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 49 | KUYKENDALL Lucas | V D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 50 | FOX Benjamin | D D D D D D | D | 2.3 | 0 | -2.3 |
| 51 | SPENCER Zyler | D D D D D D | D | 2.4 | 0 | -2.4 |
| 51 | KOU Steven | D D D D D D | D | 2.9 | 0 | -2.9 |
| 53 | MORET Declan | D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
| 54 | KUBBA Sauvil | D D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 55 | QU ethan | D D D D D D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 | |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.