Thousand Oaks, CA - Thousand Oaks, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MILAM Hugh | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 40% | |
| 2 | DAO Matthew M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 60% | 20% |
| 3 | WELLS Tommy R. | 100% | 97% | 83% | 54% | 23% | 5% | 1% |
| 3 | WANG Nathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 48% | |
| 5 | COMER Daniel T. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 12% | |
| 6 | LEE Matthew C. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 23% | 3% | |
| 7 | MEINHOLD Li | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 52% | 12% | |
| 8 | YUMIACO Nolan C. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 49% | 14% | 1% | |
| 9 | VOLK Martin L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 25% | |
| 10 | NORBUTAS Jackson S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 10% |
| 11 | JEONG Connor | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 50% | 15% |
| 12 | DINGMAN Spencer | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 52% | |
| 13 | NGO Ian M. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 24% | 4% | |
| 14 | MOHEBI Saam | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 15 | VELO Juan Manuel H. | 100% | 94% | 68% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 16 | MOORE Thomas J. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 52% | 12% | 1% | |
| 17 | KOSLU Aidan D. | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 12% | 1% | |
| 18 | USHER Alexander | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 25% | 3% | |
| 19 | LAMBRECHT Julius | 100% | 100% | 92% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 20 | SMITH Zane A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 31% | 6% |
| 21 | MATTIS George | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 22 | AHN Gus | 100% | 68% | 23% | 3% | - | - | |
| 23 | WISOFF Jeffrey | 100% | 95% | 69% | 30% | 6% | - | |
| 23 | CHU Anthony | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 9% | 1% | |
| 25 | DRIBIN Zev | 100% | 87% | 50% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 26 | CHUNG Thomas | 100% | 97% | 75% | 36% | 8% | 1% | |
| 27 | WOMACH Tristan | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 19% | 3% | |
| 28 | THOMPSON Chester | 100% | 90% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 29 | WOO Jonathan | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 27% | 6% | - |
| 30 | LIANG Aaron | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 29% | 6% |
| 31 | CHAVARIN Gustavos L. | 100% | 83% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 32 | KAGAN Spencer E. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 17% | 2% |
| 33 | GILLISON Edward L. | 100% | 96% | 74% | 34% | 8% | 1% | |
| 34 | BISEN Aryaman | 100% | 79% | 34% | 6% | - | - | |
| 35 | CONROY John L. | 100% | 80% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 36 | KOPPE Benjamin | 100% | 87% | 50% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 37 | WESTON Tom | 100% | 76% | 37% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 38 | ESTRADA Luke | 100% | 24% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.