Palm Springs Convention Center - Palm Springs, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LIU Yihong | - | - | - | 3% | 14% | 40% | 43% |
| 2 | FU Benjamin | - | - | - | 5% | 23% | 43% | 28% |
| 3 | HONG Eason | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 3% |
| 3 | LEE Daniel | 1% | 11% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 3% | |
| 5 | JIN JETFAN | - | - | - | - | 3% | 24% | 73% |
| 6 | LI Kingston | - | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 42% | 33% |
| 7 | DING Daniel | - | - | 1% | 12% | 41% | 46% | |
| 8 | HAO Hardy | 18% | 40% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 9 | LI Ethan | - | 2% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 22% | 4% |
| 10 | LI John | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 36% | 15% |
| 11 | LEUNG Joon | - | - | 3% | 18% | 42% | 37% | |
| 12 | PINCHUK Spencer | - | - | 4% | 18% | 39% | 31% | 8% |
| 13 | CHEN Andrew | 6% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 14 | LAU Jesse | 8% | 32% | 42% | 17% | 1% | - | |
| 15 | BUSH Andrew | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 16% |
| 16 | ERLIKHMAN Emanuel | 4% | 19% | 33% | 28% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 17 | YANG Mikey | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 18 | LINDBERG Everett | 1% | 7% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 18 | YIM Benjamin | - | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 37% | 12% |
| 20 | SZETO Jonathan | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
| 21 | MAH Caffrey | 1% | 8% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 4% | |
| 22 | CHI Zachary | - | 3% | 12% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 2% |
| 23 | HWANG Isaac | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 23 | WANG Alexander | 7% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 25 | KIM Ian | 43% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 26 | SHI Ethan | 2% | 16% | 37% | 34% | 10% | - | |
| 27 | SHEN Chris | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
| 28 | NI Liam | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 36% | 22% | 5% |
| 29 | LI nathan zeting | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 30 | WAN William | 9% | 33% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 31 | LU Jayden | 9% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 32 | ZHANG George | 3% | 21% | 39% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 33 | DAI Greyson | 10% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 34 | TOUPET Luke | 1% | 10% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 35 | ARULKUMAR Rihaan | 11% | 31% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - | |
| 36 | ZHANG Lucas | 1% | 8% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 4% | |
| 37 | LEE Paxton | 13% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 38 | REED Andrew | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 39 | DUCOURNAU Enzo | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 40 | LEI Hanson | - | < 1% | 8% | 38% | 47% | 6% | |
| 41 | LEE Zeo | 21% | 39% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 42 | HUO Yichen | 11% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 43 | STEPHAN Yannik Esteban | 2% | 15% | 34% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 44 | ANDERSON Aramis | 41% | 41% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 45 | YANG Liam | 9% | 32% | 38% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 46 | VILLAVERDE Aden | 13% | 33% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 47 | HAN Kyle | < 1% | 10% | 33% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.