Palm Springs Convention Center - Palm Springs, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | LUC Cedric | V V V V V | V V V V V V | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 2 | VO Blake | V V V V V V | V V V V V D | 5.3 | 6 | +0.7 |
| 3 | LEE Nathan Uju | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.3 | 6 | +0.7 |
| 3 | GREENSTEIN Viktor | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.6 | 6 | +0.4 |
| 5 | DOOLEY Atticus | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
| 6 | GRIGORIEV Roman | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 7 | GATTO Enzo P. | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 8 | XIAO Brayden | V D V V V V | V V V D | 5.5 | 5 | -0.5 |
| 9 | TANG Morgan | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
| 10 | HE Zhikai (kyle) | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.5 | 6 | +1.5 |
| 11 | TENG Lucas | V V V V V | V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
| 12 | CHAN Troy Devon | V D V V V | V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 13 | GOTTSCHALK Theodore | V D V V V | V V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 14 | HWANG Hagan | V D D V V | V V V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 15 | LO Elroy | V D V V D | V V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 16 | WONG Ron | D V D D V | V V V D | 3.7 | 2 | -1.7 |
| 17 | LI Ryan | V V V D V V | V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 18 | QI Jeremy | V V V D V | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 19 | KIM Enoch | V D V D V | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 20 | CHEN Zhengming | V D V V D | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 21 | FISCHER Noel | V V V V D D | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 22 | XIE Justin | D D V V V | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 23 | LIU Baichen (Matthew) | V D V V V D | V V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 23 | LIU Nico | V V D D V V | V V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 25 | HAO Johnny | V V D D V | V V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 26 | HRISTOV Nickolas | D V V D V | V V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 27 | SRIVATSAV Ishaan | V D V V D | V V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 28 | YUEN Caleb | V V D D V | V V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 29 | LIU Clarence | V V D D V D | V V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 30 | PI Edwin | V V D D D V | V V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 31 | LUO Gavin | D D V D V V | V V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 32 | LVOVSKIY Roman | D V V V D | V V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 33 | KIM Leo | V V V V V V | D | 3.7 | 6 | +2.3 |
| 34 | NAIR Sujit | V V V V D V | D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 35 | LOPEZ Mateo | D V V V V V | D | 3.2 | 5 | +1.8 |
| 36 | GONZALEZ Paul | V V D V V | D | 1.3 | 4 | +2.7 |
| 37 | SAHA Aadi | V V V D V | D | 1.4 | 4 | +2.6 |
| 38 | AN Chris | V V V D V D | D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 39 | SRIVATSAV Anay | D V V D V V | D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 40 | CHEN Aaron | D D V V V V | D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 41 | HAN Kyle | V V V V D D | D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 42 | MOROAICA Seiku | V V V D D | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 43 | WANG Ryan | V D D V V V | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 44 | CHOI LIAM | D V V D V V | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 45 | HO Alden | V V V D D | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 46 | FUGATE Logan | D V V V D | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 46 | SAHA Aryan | V V V D D | V D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
| 48 | SLOAN Ethan | D V D V V | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 49 | ELSAYED Yahia | V V D V D | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 50 | YANG Jake | V D D V D V | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 51 | ZHOU Ruibo | D V D D V V | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 52 | RAMBHIA Smit | D D D V V | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 53 | SU Eric | D V D V D V | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 55 | FERRING Theo | D V D V D V | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 56 | WU Lucas | D D V V D | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 57 | TONG Evan | D V D V D | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 58 | LIU Paul | D V D V D | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 59 | KIM Derek | D D D D V | V D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 60 | GU Dean | V V D D D D | V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 61 | CAO Chuck | V D V D D | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 62 | EKAMBARAM Rithik | D D D V V D | V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 63 | DESAI Arthav | D V D D D | V D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 64 | YANG Aegon | D D V V D D | V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 65 | DENG Richard | D V V V D D | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 66 | RAZAI Evan | D D V D V V | D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 67 | KUNIMOTO Adam | D V D V D V | D | 1.3 | 3 | +1.7 |
| 68 | XING Xueyuan | D D V V D | D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 69 | FU BRANDEN | D D D V V | D | 3.9 | 2 | -1.9 |
| 70 | WANG James | V D V D D | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 71 | WU Allen | D V D D V | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 72 | NGUYEN Ethan | D V V D D D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 73 | HORN Diodorus | V D V D D D | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 74 | LEI Isaac | D V D V D D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 75 | WANG Darren | D V D V D D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 76 | VENKATRAMAN Sushil | V D D D D V | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 | |
| 77 | HE Richard | D D V V D D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 78 | DUFF Michael | D D D D V | D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
| 79 | WOLLOW Bennett | V D D D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 80 | WU Dustin | D D V D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 81 | LOH Dylan | D D V D D | D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
| 82 | STANTON William | D D D V D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 83 | LEE Brendan | D D D D V D | D | 3.4 | 1 | -2.4 |
| 84 | JI Derek | D D D D V D | D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
| 86 | IVERSON Niels | D D D V D D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 86 | PALOMBO Gabriel | D V D D D D | D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
| 88 | RHODES Bryce | D D D D D V | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 89 | CHEN Harrison | D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 90 | LOVELL Jackson | D D D D D V | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 91 | SHI Jeremy | V D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 92 | LEE Bill King | D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
| 93 | HSIEH Maxwell | D D D D D D | D | 2.5 | 0 | -2.5 |
| 94 | ELSAYED Omar | D D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 |
| 95 | RAPHAEL Pierson | D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 96 | JUNG Andres | D D D D D D | D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 |
| 97 | STERN Kazuki | D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 98 | HADFIELD Gavin | D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
| 99 | NG Jaden | D D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.