Richmond Fencing Club - Richmond, VA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | BAYUS Oliver | 100% | 99% | 86% | 49% | 14% | 1% | |
| 2 | REHDER Silas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 14% |
| 3 | HAYES Nathan P. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 26% | 4% | |
| 3 | WU Jiachen | 100% | 99% | 85% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 5 | WU Shaochi | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 18% | 2% |
| 6 | LUNDEN Espen | 100% | 97% | 78% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 7 | RAWSON Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 28% | |
| 8 | JARRATT Isaac | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 9 | SINGH Meet | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 43% | 11% |
| 10 | NANAYAKKARA Damin | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 34% | ||
| 11 | BOZARTH Alex | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 76% | 15% | |
| 12 | QU RuiTing | 100% | 94% | 68% | 31% | 8% | 1% | |
| 13 | REHDER Caleb | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 28% |
| 14 | GUO Benjamin | 100% | 97% | 78% | 37% | 7% | ||
| 15 | GRAMLICH Bradley | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 24% | 3% | |
| 16 | ABU-AJAJ Mohamed | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 17 | MOORE Mary | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 37% | 8% | |
| 18 | KARASICK Andrew | 100% | 99% | 86% | 48% | 11% | ||
| 18 | SIMS Martin L. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 65% | 15% | 1% | |
| 20 | CAVE Rylan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 24% | |
| 21 | GALIOTE James | 100% | 74% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 22 | AMES Jeremy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 22% |
| 23 | HURST Palmer | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 71% | |
| 24 | CHONG Eden | 100% | 99% | 84% | 26% | 2% | - | |
| 25 | NANAYAKKARA Sanuthi | 100% | 66% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
| 26 | RAGSDALE Lillian | 100% | 78% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 27 | PETROVSKI Kiril | 100% | 68% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 28 | SMITHSON Matthew | 100% | 48% | 10% | 1% | - | ||
| 29 | CAMPBELL Paul | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 10% | |
| 30 | HALES Adam | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 13% | 2% | |
| 31 | SOUTHWORTH Connor | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 32 | MARCUS Jonah | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 25% | 3% | |
| 33 | STRAFFORD Andrew | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 18% | 2% | |
| 34 | SWENSON Jason | 100% | 93% | 57% | 18% | 2% | ||
| 35 | HUANG Taohua | 100% | 92% | 60% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 36 | BADLANI Neel | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 13% | 2% | |
| 37 | VILLAVICENCIO Fiorella | 100% | 72% | 21% | 2% | - | - | |
| 38 | YANG Chuhan | 100% | 99% | 85% | 50% | 14% | 1% | |
| 39 | COTHRAN Nicholas | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 32% | 7% | |
| 40 | GAGNON Charles | 100% | 95% | 71% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 41 | GUARDIOLA JR Oscar | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 42 | AKKALE Reyhan | 100% | 76% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 43 | CRAMER Jay | 100% | 52% | 7% | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.