Palm Springs Convention Center - Palm Springs, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MAZAHERI Fletcher | - | - | - | - | 2% | 20% | 79% |
| 2 | LI Daniel | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 42% | 42% |
| 3 | RODRIGUEZ Tyler | - | - | - | - | 4% | 29% | 67% |
| 3 | ONG Nicholas | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 46% | 41% |
| 5 | JACOB Ezra | - | - | 4% | 18% | 39% | 31% | 8% |
| 6 | WEI Winston | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 37% | 16% |
| 7 | LOZANO Veyron Jericho | - | - | - | - | 5% | 32% | 62% |
| 8 | WANG Tiger | - | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 13% |
| 9 | CHANG Jeremy | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 43% | 26% |
| 10 | BIELER Mason | - | - | - | - | 3% | 23% | 73% |
| 11 | ZHOU Shawn | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 34% | 58% |
| 12 | PARK Andrew | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 42% | 31% |
| 13 | LI Lucas | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 49% | 30% |
| 14 | CHEN Steven | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
| 15 | CHANG Eric Jonathan | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 42% | 38% |
| 16 | LEE Abin | - | - | 1% | 11% | 33% | 39% | 15% |
| 17 | WANG Elijah (QiChen) | - | - | 1% | 7% | 33% | 60% | |
| 18 | PLUMMER Waylon | - | - | 2% | 12% | 37% | 40% | 9% |
| 19 | WANG Waylon | - | - | 5% | 25% | 42% | 25% | 2% |
| 20 | SANCHEZ MARTINEZ Victor Noel | - | 4% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 1% |
| 21 | YE Jerry | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 40% | 26% | 4% |
| 22 | PARK Gi Beom | - | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 43% | 24% |
| 23 | GUO Austin | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 39% | 28% | 6% |
| 24 | YANG Charles | - | - | - | - | 5% | 29% | 66% |
| 25 | RAU Shogun | - | - | 2% | 15% | 39% | 37% | 6% |
| 26 | CHEN kenneth | - | - | 6% | 27% | 42% | 23% | 2% |
| 27 | MURDOCK Koichi | - | 1% | 11% | 34% | 39% | 15% | 1% |
| 28 | ZHANG Jason | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 6% |
| 29 | GUDIMETLA Siddhanth | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
| 30 | MAZAHERI John | - | 3% | 16% | 38% | 34% | 8% | 1% |
| 31 | HUANG Nathan | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 3% |
| 32 | PESKIN Kepler | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
| 33 | PARK Avan | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 2% |
| 34 | WANG sicheng | - | - | 2% | 11% | 33% | 41% | 14% |
| 35 | TSUI Raedyn Ho Hin | - | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 9% |
| 36 | TSUI Kaylan Ho Sen | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 3% |
| 37 | LEONG Wilson Hua | - | 5% | 23% | 40% | 27% | 4% | |
| 38 | SLAIN Owen | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 38% | 19% | 2% |
| 39 | GANAPATHI Eshan | - | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 38% | 14% |
| 40 | XU Ethan | 1% | 10% | 32% | 38% | 17% | 2% | |
| 41 | ALVAREZ Francisco Janusz | 1% | 14% | 36% | 35% | 13% | 1% | |
| 42 | YUNG Brandon | - | 5% | 22% | 41% | 27% | 5% | - |
| 43 | JIN Yucheng | - | 2% | 17% | 40% | 32% | 9% | - |
| 44 | LI Yunze | 6% | 29% | 40% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 45 | LI Jake | - | 2% | 24% | 42% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 46 | SHA Lambor（Laien) | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 47 | YANG Steve | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
| 48 | LEE Ryan | 1% | 16% | 36% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 49 | OH Kepler | 2% | 15% | 35% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 50 | LOPES-EASON Liam James | 1% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 51 | TEJAKUSUMA Eric | 1% | 11% | 38% | 36% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 52 | MAZAHERI Theodore | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 53 | MAO Runxian | 4% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 54 | HE Ian | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 35% | 14% | 1% |
| 55 | PARK Kaiden | 3% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 56 | CHEN Kurtis | 1% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 57 | LEE Colin | 21% | 42% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 58 | SHENOY Neil | 5% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 59 | CREMEL Remi | - | 2% | 25% | 42% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 60 | SHENOY sean | 2% | 12% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 61 | HONG Edwin | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 43% | 21% | 2% |
| 62 | WU Gengze (Daniel) | - | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% |
| 63 | BERMUDEZ Gamaliel | 15% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 64 | CHETWANI naman | 15% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 65 | ZHANG Aiden | - | 4% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
| 66 | LI Aaron | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 8% | 1% |
| 67 | SAFTA Aidan | - | 5% | 21% | 39% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
| 68 | LIU Aiden | 6% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 69 | LIN Dylan | 20% | 41% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 70 | TAN Alan | 1% | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% | - |
| 71 | PARKS Maxwell | 26% | 43% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 72 | KUK Francis | 13% | 38% | 35% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 73 | YOO Christian | 9% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 74 | CHENG Alvin | 13% | 37% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 75 | TAN Benjamin | 10% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 76 | WANG Eason | 6% | 33% | 39% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 77 | TROYANKER Makar | 3% | 25% | 40% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 78 | KAJITA Grayson | 28% | 43% | 23% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 79 | SINGH Reyaansh | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 79 | LIN Sampson | 13% | 37% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 81 | CHANG Austin | 10% | 34% | 38% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 82 | JUE Lucas | 6% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 82 | GU Evan | 14% | 34% | 32% | 15% | 4% | - | - |
| 84 | YAN Aaron | 9% | 34% | 38% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 86 | GOURLEY Jack | 55% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 87 | ULZIIBOLD Sean | 41% | 41% | 15% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 88 | CABATO Luca | 16% | 52% | 27% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 89 | FALCONE Mateo | 43% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 90 | WONG Sebastian | 27% | 44% | 24% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 91 | ROLON Maximiliano | 63% | 35% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 92 | CHEN XianBin | 17% | 41% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 93 | NGO Lincoln | 50% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 94 | LEE Joshua | 10% | 37% | 38% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 95 | FOO Kingston | 8% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 96 | WANG Andy | 26% | 61% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 97 | LINTNER-CALVO Julien | 68% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 98 | ZUO Thomas | 61% | 34% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.