Palm Springs Convention Center - Palm Springs, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | LOPEZ Mateo | V V V V V | V V V V V V | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 2 | YUEN Caleb | V V V V V V | V V V V V D | 4.7 | 6 | +1.3 |
| 3 | LUO Gavin | V D V V V | V V V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 3 | LEE Kyle | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.5 | 6 | +1.5 |
| 5 | SU Eric | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.2 | 6 | +1.8 |
| 6 | MOROAICA Seiku | D V V V V V | V V V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 7 | FU BRANDEN | D V V V V V | V V V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
| 8 | TABANCAY Cole | V V V V D V | V V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 9 | RAZAI Evan | V V V V V V | V V D | 3.9 | 6 | +2.1 |
| 10 | QI Zach | V V V V V | V V D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
| 11 | LVOVSKIY Roman | V V D V V V | V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 12 | LI Jason | V V V V D | V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 13 | FAKHRI Adrian | V V V D V | V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 14 | WANG David | V V V V D D | V V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 15 | YE Aaron | D D V D V V | V V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 16 | DING Orlando | V D D D D V | V V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 17 | HSIEH Sebastian | V V V V V | V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
| 18 | DENG Richard | V V V V V | V D | 2.9 | 5 | +2.1 |
| 19 | ZHANG Hanzhi | V V V V V D | V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 20 | ELSAYED Omar | V D V V V V | V D | 3.2 | 5 | +1.8 |
| 21 | WANG Henrik | V V V V D | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 22 | CHEN Aaron | V V V V D | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 23 | CHUNG Evan | D V V V V | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 24 | CHOI LIAM | V V V V D D | V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 25 | DESAI Arthav | V V D D V V | V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 26 | LIU Nico | D V V D V V | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 27 | YANG Aegon | V V V V D D | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 28 | DUFF Michael | D V V D V | V D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
| 29 | HSIEH Maxwell | V D V D V | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 30 | WANG James | V V D V D | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 30 | PI Edwin | D V D V V | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 32 | RAMOS Pious | D V D V D V | V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 33 | LEI Isaac | D V V V V V | D | 2.9 | 5 | +2.1 |
| 34 | XING Xueyuan | V V V V D D | D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
| 35 | CAO Chuck | V V D V D V | D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 36 | CHEN Harrison | V V V D D | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 37 | LI Edward | D V D V V D | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 38 | EKAMBARAM Rithik | V D D V D V | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 39 | LOVELL Jackson | V D D D V V | D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
| 40 | HE Richard | D V V D D V | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 41 | WU Allen | V D V D D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 42 | JI Derek | D V D V D | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 43 | XIN Ryan | D V D V D | D | 0.9 | 2 | +1.1 |
| 44 | BERKI wyatt | D D V V D | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 45 | LAD Anish | V D D D V | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 46 | GUO ATTICUS | V D D D V | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 47 | FAN Yuchen | D D D D V V | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 48 | WOLLOW Bennett | D V D D V D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 49 | FERRING Theo | D V D D D V | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 50 | GALANG Aiden | D D V V D D | D | 4.0 | 2 | -2.0 |
| 51 | FAN Yuen | V D D D V D | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 52 | NG Jaden | V D D V D D | D | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
| 53 | SUN Alan | D D V D D V | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 54 | HADFIELD Gavin | V D D V D D | D | 0.7 | 2 | +1.3 |
| 55 | LEE Hubert Junhu | D D D D V | D | 2.9 | 1 | -1.9 |
| 56 | ZHU Mason | D D D V D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 57 | WU August | D D D D V | V D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 58 | CHEN Donovan | D D D D V D | V D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
| 59 | PALOMBO Gabriel | D D V D D D | V D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 60 | ZHENG Matt | D D D D D D | V D | 2.3 | 0 | -2.3 |
| 61 | LIN Rongcheng Noah | D D D D D | V D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 62 | WU Aiden | D D D D D | V D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
| 63 | BOURCIER Rowan | D D D D D D | V D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 63 | CHAN Ethan | D D D D D D | V D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
| 65 | LIU Jayden | D D D D V | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 66 | CHEN Maorui | D D D D V D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 67 | QIAO Jason | D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
| 68 | KIM Dylan | D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 69 | CONCANNON Jackson | D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 |
| 70 | NGUYEN Tristan | D D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
| 71 | JIANG Hardy | D D D D D D | D | 4.0 | 0 | -4.0 |
| 72 | GOURJI Roman | D D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.