Richmond Fencing Club - Richmond, VA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | YI Nathan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 27% | 4% |
| 2 | YI Kyle | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 43% |
| 3 | SWENSON Keane J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 48% |
| 3 | WHITE Myles | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 16% |
| 5 | DIMMETT David C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 66% |
| 6 | LANG Kurt | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 35% |
| 7 | WU Shaochi | 100% | 100% | 92% | 65% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 8 | SHELLY Emery | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 44% | 14% | 1% |
| 9 | RAWSON Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 24% | 2% |
| 10 | BENUCCI Vincent | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 11 | GLOGOWSKI Konrad | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 19% |
| 12 | DILDA Griffin | 100% | 100% | 92% | 60% | 16% | - | |
| 13 | WATSON Raymond | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 27% |
| 14 | CANDELARIA Armando | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 17% | 2% |
| 15 | HAYES Nathan P. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 17% | 2% |
| 16 | ISAACSON Bjorn | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 37% | 1% | |
| 17 | WALLACE George | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 31% |
| 18 | ANDERSON Jr. Danny R. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 49% | 12% | - | |
| 19 | EVANS Allen L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 46% | 8% |
| 20 | STRAFFORD Andrew | 100% | 95% | 70% | 27% | 5% | < 1% | - |
| 21 | O'HARA Keegan J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 91% | |
| 22 | ABU-AJAJ Mohamed | 100% | 93% | 67% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 23 | BAYUS Oliver | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 24 | WU Jiachen | 100% | 79% | 28% | 4% | - | - | |
| 24 | CAMPBELL Paul | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 12% | 1% |
| 26 | BOZARTH Alex | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 25% | 4% |
| 27 | GUO Benjamin | 100% | 84% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 28 | DE MEDEIROS Cecilia | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
| 29 | CHONG Eden | 100% | 52% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 30 | TANG Justin | 100% | 100% | 90% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 31 | KARASICK Andrew | 100% | 96% | 75% | 40% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 32 | HO Lucas | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 33 | DELONG Mike | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 15% | 1% |
| 34 | SILVA Hailey | 100% | 98% | 73% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 35 | SHIN Jamie | 100% | 73% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 36 | CAVE Rylan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 27% | 4% |
| 37 | QU RuiTing | 100% | 100% | 92% | 59% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 38 | KRECK Marie | 100% | 99% | 83% | 31% | 4% | - | - |
| 39 | GRAMLICH Bradley | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 40 | HUANG Taohua | 100% | 80% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 41 | LUNDEN Espen | 100% | 87% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 42 | COTHRAN Nicholas | 100% | 92% | 63% | 27% | 6% | - | - |
| 43 | SOUTHWORTH Connor | 100% | 92% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 44 | RAGSDALE Lillian | 100% | 80% | 40% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 45 | COX Jeniffer | 100% | 92% | 55% | 8% | - | - | - |
| 46 | SMITHSON Matthew | 100% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 46 | COX Brian | 100% | 97% | 78% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 49 | CRAMER Jay | 100% | 74% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.