Richmond Fencing Club - Richmond, VA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | PRICE Owen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 61% | |
| 2 | SKOLNICK Michael W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 22% |
| 3 | NANAYAKKARA Dinuth | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 32% | 7% |
| 3 | CHANG Zane | 100% | 97% | 77% | 36% | 8% | 1% | |
| 5 | CHANG Xavier | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 83% | 38% | 6% |
| 6 | HAYES Nathan P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 62% | |
| 7 | BORAN Connor | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 30% | 4% | |
| 8 | AN Jasmine N. | 100% | 91% | 60% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 9 | FAYVUSOVICH Emmanual | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 36% | 8% |
| 10 | SOPHRONIUS Jeddie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 37% | |
| 11 | DELANNES-MOLKA Daniel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 17% | |
| 12 | SINGH Meet | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 40% | 13% | 2% |
| 13 | MITCHELL Robert | 100% | 93% | 64% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 14 | ROUNTREE Andrew | 100% | 100% | 94% | 62% | 19% | 1% | |
| 15 | IVATURI Sivakrishna Nikhil | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 74% | 39% | 9% |
| 16 | GUARDIOLA Emily | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 17 | SIMANDJUNTAK Joshua | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 16% | 2% |
| 18 | CONANT Aidan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 58% | 25% | 5% |
| 19 | SCHICKEL Juliana | 100% | 90% | 60% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 20 | JONES Zamauri | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 27% | 4% | |
| 21 | SHEA Aleksander | 100% | 84% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 21 | TINGLE Byrd | 100% | 100% | 96% | 65% | 21% | 2% | |
| 23 | TANG Justin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 65% | 31% | 7% |
| 24 | CICCHI Nicolas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 25% | 4% |
| 25 | LAU-ALLEN Macy | 100% | 90% | 52% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 26 | YEE Calvin | 100% | 56% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
| 27 | TOLENTINO SR. Francis | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 80% | 48% | 14% |
| 28 | SOTO Alejandro | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 28% | 5% | - |
| 29 | SMITH IV Edward (Ted) A. | 100% | 91% | 45% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 30 | LI Happy | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 31 | BLEVINS Carolyn | 100% | 88% | 52% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 32 | SIMANJUNTAK Jocelyn | 100% | 93% | 68% | 34% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 33 | JACOFF Amelia | 100% | 72% | 26% | 4% | - | - | |
| 34 | KRUPICKA Evelyn | 100% | 99% | 87% | 50% | 10% | - | |
| 35 | HAVERSON Rana | 100% | 86% | 50% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 36 | TRAN Katarina | 100% | 70% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
| 37 | DILLENBACK Isaiah | 100% | 100% | 93% | 64% | 19% | 2% | |
| 37 | HALL Joshua | 100% | 93% | 67% | 30% | 7% | 1% | |
| 39 | REARDON Caleb | 100% | 70% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.