Thousand Oaks, CA - Thousand Oaks, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | PROUTY Nicholas C. | - | - | - | 1% | 16% | 52% | 31% |
2 | NGUYEN Nish | - | 5% | 22% | 39% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
3 | BURKE Spencer W. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 33% | 43% | 12% |
3 | MORALES Ian N. | - | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
5 | KUMBLA Samarth | - | - | - | 1% | 6% | 32% | 61% |
6 | WU Conrad J. | 2% | 14% | 30% | 31% | 17% | 5% | - |
7 | JEON Caleb A. | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 38% | 16% | 2% |
8 | CHENG Matthew S. | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
9 | PIESNER Joshua C. | - | - | 2% | 9% | 27% | 40% | 23% |
10 | OH Jonathan | - | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 8% |
11 | YAKUSHKIN Ernest D. | - | - | - | 1% | 12% | 45% | 41% |
12 | XIAO Edward | - | 4% | 30% | 47% | 16% | 2% | - |
13 | CHEN Wilson | 2% | 13% | 29% | 32% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
14 | GODZHIK Zachary | - | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 46% | 15% |
15 | NAYGAS Lawrence I. | - | - | - | 4% | 18% | 42% | 36% |
16 | MUSHER Benjamin J. | - | - | - | 5% | 24% | 47% | 24% |
17 | LO Conrad | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 18% |
18 | HERNANDEZ Sebastian | - | 4% | 14% | 28% | 31% | 18% | 4% |
19 | PIESNER Zachary C. | - | 3% | 12% | 27% | 33% | 20% | 5% |
20 | SADOVSKY Leor B. | - | 6% | 35% | 40% | 16% | 3% | - |
21 | GOLDADE Luke A. | 29% | 43% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
22 | KIM Derek A. | 13% | 39% | 36% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
23 | MASCARI DUMONT Alexandre | 21% | 38% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
24 | LI Ryan Z. | 62% | 33% | 5% | < 1% | - | - | - |
25 | WONG Luke S. | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 16% | 3% |
26 | ZHOU Oscar J. | - | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 33% | 11% |
27 | HOBSON Aaron K. | 5% | 37% | 41% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
28 | KIM Banseok | 1% | 5% | 19% | 32% | 28% | 12% | 2% |
29 | CHEN Christopher | 5% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
30 | PONG Caleb J. | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 19% | 4% |
31 | LEE David Y. | 24% | 41% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
32 | KACZOR Gunnar | 4% | 20% | 38% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
33 | MASCARI DUMONT Louis | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
34 | MO Jason | - | - | 3% | 18% | 39% | 33% | 7% |
35 | OH Joshua | 5% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
36 | LAKE Wyatt J. | 1% | 7% | 21% | 32% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
37 | LE Jacob W. | - | 5% | 27% | 47% | 19% | 3% | - |
38 | NGUYEN Liam | - | - | 4% | 26% | 52% | 16% | 1% |
39 | WONG Matthew H. | 1% | 9% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 6% | - |
40 | RYOU Aiden | 5% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
41 | LLIDO Soren | 24% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
42 | ZHENG zhe | 66% | 30% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
43 | LI Peihong | 1% | 6% | 19% | 32% | 28% | 13% | 2% |
44 | JI Evan | 1% | 8% | 30% | 38% | 19% | 4% | - |
45 | OH Jaden | 2% | 19% | 38% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - |
46 | ULLOA Trent J. | 6% | 32% | 45% | 15% | 1% | - | - |
47 | HARRIS Rhonen | 16% | 42% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.