Boston Fencing Club - Boston, MA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | WU Wallace | V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 2 | GUGALA Frank | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 3 | HU Michael | V V V V | V V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 3 | SONG Enoch | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 5 | ZHONG Kingsley | V V V V V | V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 6 | ROPER Griffin | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 7 | DENG Jonathan | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
| 8 | ZHAO David | V D V V V | V V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 9 | HAN Jiaren | V V V V D | V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 10 | LI Andrew | V V D V V | V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 11 | ZHENG Vincent | V D V V | V V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 12 | FOMIN Dashiell | V V D V V | V V D | 2.0 | 4 | +2.0 |
| 13 | GENG Vincent | V V V V D | V V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 14 | LECH Landon | V V V D V | V V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 16 | LIU Brady | V D V | V V D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 17 | TIAN Andy | D V V V V | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 18 | MOON Nolan | D V V V V | V | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 19 | LEE Ryan | V V V D V | V D | 1.8 | 4 | +2.2 |
| 20 | YOON Mason | V V D V V | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 21 | FANG Ryan | V V D V V | V D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
| 22 | XIA Wenhao | D V V V D | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 23 | GUTKOVSKIY Ryan | D V V D V | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 24 | XU Jaden | V V V D D | V D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
| 25 | HU Hudson | V D D V | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 26 | YU Adam | V D D D V | V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 27 | BRADY David | V D D V D | V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 28 | LIU KUNDE | D V V D D | V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 29 | SAVIR Ethan | V D D D V | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 30 | LU Ethan | D D D D V | V D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
| 31 | PELLERIN Liam | D D D D V | V D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 32 | ZARAYSKI Thomas | D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
| 33 | CHONG Cooper | V V D V V | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 | |
| 34 | CHEN Keegan | V V V | D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 35 | DAVE Neil | D D V V V | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 36 | LIU KELVIN | V D D V V | D | 1.1 | 3 | +1.9 |
| 37 | STARK Ethan | V D V D V | D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 38 | WU Yulen | D V D V D | D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 39 | KISHAN Samridh | V D D V D | D | 4.0 | 2 | -2.0 |
| 41 | BERLOW Hudson | D D V V D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 42 | BHOSREKAR Som | V D V D D | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 43 | SALERNO A.J. | D V D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 44 | SHAO Ruiyi | D D D V D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 45 | JUTAGIR Eugene | D D V D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 | |
| 46 | WENG Jingfan | D V D D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 47 | BANGALE Viraaj | D D V D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 48 | CRIUCOV Daniel | D V D D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 49 | SCHNEIDER Aiden | D D V D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 50 | HWANG Samuel | D D V D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 51 | TANAKA Nico | D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
| 52 | KAZAKOV Alexander | D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
| 53 | LI Ethan | D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 54 | CUI Jason | D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
| 55 | LI Gabriel | D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
| 56 | RICE Henry | D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 57 | MASTAN Patrick | D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 58 | SINGH Deven | D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
| 58 | GIORDANO Thomas | D D D D D | D | 3.1 | 0 | -3.1 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.