San Francisco, CA - San Francisco, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ZHANG Sylvia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 72% | 25% | |
| 2 | CHO Gracie L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 30% | |
| 3 | LI Phoebe J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 16% | |
| 3 | SHIH Diane | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 31% | 5% | |
| 5 | ALTEN Ayaka | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 39% | 9% |
| 6 | LEE Isabelle | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 24% | |
| 7 | SU Alysa J. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 15% | 2% |
| 8 | KOROL Neta | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 15% | |
| 9 | SHITAMOTO Audrey F. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 18% | 2% | |
| 10 | GEBALA Gabrielle Grace A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 22% | |
| 11 | TALWALKAR Apoorva | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 19% | |
| 12 | CUI Melody J. | 100% | 94% | 65% | 21% | 3% | - | |
| 13 | KOROL Dana | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 21% | |
| 14 | CHUNG Jaein | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 29% | |
| 15 | LUO Sandra J. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 27% | 4% | |
| 16 | DAVIS Bonnie Z. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 12% | |
| 17 | FERNANDES Thea | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 36% | 8% |
| 18 | TOM Caitlyn | 100% | 95% | 70% | 30% | 6% | - | |
| 19 | SUN Chien-Yu | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 30% | 5% | |
| 20 | SU Alena J. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 9% | |
| 21 | LEE Samantha X. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 52% | 16% | 2% | |
| 22 | GREEN Perri L. | 100% | 76% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 23 | BHARATHI Maithreyi S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 33% | 7% |
| 24 | SUN Ruoxi | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 35% | 6% | |
| 25 | HO Rachel E. | 100% | 98% | 82% | 47% | 14% | 2% | |
| 26 | HSIUNG Samantha | 100% | 78% | 31% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 27 | WALBERT Charlotte B. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 31% | 6% | |
| 28 | KIM Hyunchae Y. | 100% | 96% | 72% | 33% | 7% | 1% | |
| 29 | KOSLOW Amicie | 100% | 92% | 53% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 31 | WELBORN Calissa | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 17% | 2% | |
| 32 | LEE Bethanie | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 33% | 6% | |
| 33 | UPENDER Cosette K. | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 11% | 1% | |
| 34 | DERMETZIS Adriana | 100% | 61% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
| 35 | GONG Chloe | 100% | 84% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 36 | LIN Katherine Y. | 100% | 84% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 37 | HOBSON Ava | 100% | 88% | 44% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 38 | ZHEREBCHEVSKA Veronika | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 39 | NARBERES Emily R. | 100% | 54% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
| 40 | DHILLON Amani | 100% | 67% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
| 41 | NAGPAL Reyna | 100% | 85% | 40% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 42 | ELANGOVAN Mamata | 100% | 81% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.