Boston Fencing Club - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | GATES Combustion | - | - | - | 5% | 32% | 62% |
| 2 | LI Jayden | - | - | 4% | 22% | 45% | 29% |
| 3 | HOU Gaven | - | - | - | 1% | 13% | 87% |
| 3 | ZHONG Kingsley | - | 6% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 6% |
| 5 | WANG Luke | - | - | 8% | 30% | 42% | 20% |
| 6 | QIAN Zekai | - | - | 4% | 20% | 42% | 34% |
| 7 | ZHAI Alex | - | 2% | 13% | 40% | 45% | |
| 8 | ZHANG Aaron | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 42% | 17% |
| 9 | WU Alexander | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 21% |
| 10 | WU Wallace | - | - | - | 6% | 32% | 62% |
| 11 | HU Michael | - | - | 3% | 19% | 45% | 33% |
| 12 | ZHAO David | - | 3% | 16% | 38% | 36% | 7% |
| 13 | NOVIKOV Yann | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 42% | 28% |
| 14 | SONG Enoch | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 18% |
| 15 | HU Daniel | 1% | 10% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 3% |
| 16 | BRADY David | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
| 17 | ROPER Griffin | - | 1% | 11% | 36% | 39% | 13% |
| 18 | BRILLANTES Luke | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 42% | 22% |
| 19 | AYYAGARI Abhiram | - | - | 8% | 30% | 42% | 20% |
| 20 | HU Weijie | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 13% |
| 21 | JABLOKOV Roman | - | 1% | 12% | 37% | 38% | 12% |
| 22 | LU Hansen | - | 4% | 21% | 42% | 29% | 4% |
| 23 | GUGALA Frank | - | 2% | 18% | 39% | 32% | 9% |
| 24 | TIAN Dylan | 1% | 8% | 32% | 39% | 18% | 3% |
| 25 | ZHENG Vincent | - | 4% | 26% | 41% | 24% | 5% |
| 26 | WONG Maxwell | 20% | 41% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 27 | DENG Jonathan | 4% | 21% | 41% | 28% | 6% | |
| 28 | MASON Frederick | 1% | 8% | 29% | 43% | 19% | 1% |
| 29 | DAWSON Myer | 4% | 28% | 42% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 30 | LIU Brady | 35% | 43% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 31 | LECH Landon | 2% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 14% | 1% |
| 32 | DAVE Neil | 6% | 32% | 41% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 33 | TIAN Andy | - | 4% | 20% | 42% | 29% | 4% |
| 34 | SUSANTO William | - | - | - | 4% | 26% | 70% |
| 35 | GLODE Russell | - | 1% | 12% | 35% | 38% | 14% |
| 36 | BU Ethan | - | 4% | 20% | 41% | 29% | 6% |
| 37 | HAN Jiaren | 2% | 13% | 36% | 36% | 12% | 1% |
| 38 | LI Andrew | - | 3% | 19% | 42% | 33% | 2% |
| 39 | LEVKOVICH Avery | 1% | 7% | 25% | 40% | 24% | 3% |
| 40 | LEE Aeden | 1% | 7% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 5% |
| 41 | AHMAD Uzayr | - | 3% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 10% |
| 42 | KERSHA Alexander | 1% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
| 43 | FANG Ryan | 4% | 25% | 40% | 25% | 6% | - |
| 44 | CHAE Thomas Woojin | 3% | 20% | 39% | 29% | 8% | - |
| 45 | WOODWORTH Desmond | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 24% | 5% |
| 46 | GOLI Arush | 12% | 38% | 36% | 13% | 1% | |
| 47 | ZHIXUAN Gao | - | 5% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 7% |
| 48 | MOON Nolan | - | 4% | 24% | 41% | 25% | 5% |
| 49 | BRADFORD-WATT Ezra | 1% | 14% | 42% | 33% | 10% | 1% |
| 50 | ZHANG Eric | - | 6% | 25% | 39% | 25% | 5% |
| 51 | CHEN Kevin | 7% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 52 | MANCHALA Vedanth | 3% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
| 52 | SUN Andrew | 15% | 39% | 34% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 54 | WULIN Nicholas | 22% | 43% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 55 | BORGES Julien | 22% | 42% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 56 | REN Ryan | 3% | 20% | 41% | 30% | 6% | |
| 57 | LIU KELVIN | 35% | 51% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 58 | TANAKA Nico | 27% | 47% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 59 | NEWTON Zeke | 10% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 60 | PELLERIN Liam | 66% | 29% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 61 | HUANG Alec | 27% | 43% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 62 | DEGRYSE Leopold | 17% | 40% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 63 | KOEFERL Miles | 6% | 28% | 42% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 64 | SHINDE Aksh | 28% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 65 | NG Deacon | 2% | 13% | 35% | 36% | 14% | 1% |
| 66 | BHOSREKAR Som | 23% | 51% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 67 | HASSETT Edward | 13% | 36% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 68 | MACCIOLI Daniel | 42% | 45% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 69 | LIU Kunshuo | 32% | 42% | 20% | 5% | - | - |
| 70 | ROTONDO Max | 6% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
| 70 | LAWRENCE James | 11% | 34% | 37% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 72 | KALESHIAN Julien | 1% | 41% | 40% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 73 | ANDERSON Kai | 28% | 51% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 74 | CUI Mason | 57% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 74 | LAQUER Tyler | 51% | 41% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 76 | HAO Zerui | 41% | 47% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 77 | LEE Jacob | 47% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.