Boston Fencing Club - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | GATES Combustion | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 62% |
| 2 | LI Jayden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 29% |
| 3 | HOU Gaven | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% |
| 3 | ZHONG Kingsley | 100% | 100% | 93% | 68% | 30% | 6% |
| 5 | WANG Luke | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 62% | 20% |
| 6 | QIAN Zekai | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 34% |
| 7 | ZHAI Alex | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 45% | |
| 8 | ZHANG Aaron | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 17% |
| 9 | WU Alexander | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 21% |
| 10 | WU Wallace | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 62% |
| 11 | HU Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 33% |
| 12 | ZHAO David | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 43% | 7% |
| 13 | NOVIKOV Yann | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 28% |
| 14 | SONG Enoch | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 18% |
| 15 | HU Daniel | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 22% | 3% |
| 16 | BRADY David | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 15% | 2% |
| 17 | ROPER Griffin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 51% | 13% |
| 18 | BRILLANTES Luke | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 22% |
| 19 | AYYAGARI Abhiram | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 62% | 20% |
| 20 | HU Weijie | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 13% |
| 21 | JABLOKOV Roman | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 49% | 12% |
| 22 | LU Hansen | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 33% | 4% |
| 23 | GUGALA Frank | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 41% | 9% |
| 24 | TIAN Dylan | 100% | 99% | 92% | 59% | 21% | 3% |
| 25 | ZHENG Vincent | 100% | 100% | 96% | 69% | 28% | 5% |
| 26 | WONG Maxwell | 100% | 80% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 27 | DENG Jonathan | 100% | 96% | 75% | 34% | 6% | |
| 28 | MASON Frederick | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 19% | 1% |
| 29 | DAWSON Myer | 100% | 96% | 68% | 26% | 4% | - |
| 30 | LIU Brady | 100% | 65% | 21% | 3% | - | |
| 31 | LECH Landon | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 15% | 1% |
| 32 | DAVE Neil | 100% | 94% | 62% | 21% | 3% | - |
| 33 | TIAN Andy | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 34% | 4% |
| 34 | SUSANTO William | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 70% |
| 35 | GLODE Russell | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 52% | 14% |
| 36 | BU Ethan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 35% | 6% |
| 37 | HAN Jiaren | 100% | 98% | 85% | 49% | 13% | 1% |
| 38 | LI Andrew | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 35% | 2% |
| 39 | LEVKOVICH Avery | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 28% | 3% |
| 40 | LEE Aeden | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 28% | 5% |
| 41 | AHMAD Uzayr | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 10% |
| 42 | KERSHA Alexander | 100% | 99% | 87% | 56% | 21% | 3% |
| 43 | FANG Ryan | 100% | 96% | 71% | 32% | 6% | - |
| 44 | CHAE Thomas Woojin | 100% | 97% | 77% | 38% | 9% | - |
| 45 | WOODWORTH Desmond | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 29% | 5% |
| 46 | GOLI Arush | 100% | 88% | 50% | 14% | 1% | |
| 47 | ZHIXUAN Gao | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 7% |
| 48 | MOON Nolan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 72% | 31% | 5% |
| 49 | BRADFORD-WATT Ezra | 100% | 99% | 85% | 43% | 10% | 1% |
| 50 | ZHANG Eric | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 30% | 5% |
| 51 | CHEN Kevin | 100% | 93% | 66% | 27% | 5% | - |
| 52 | MANCHALA Vedanth | 100% | 97% | 78% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
| 52 | SUN Andrew | 100% | 85% | 46% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 54 | WULIN Nicholas | 100% | 78% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 55 | BORGES Julien | 100% | 78% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 56 | REN Ryan | 100% | 97% | 77% | 36% | 6% | |
| 57 | LIU KELVIN | 100% | 65% | 13% | 1% | - | - |
| 58 | TANAKA Nico | 100% | 73% | 26% | 4% | - | - |
| 59 | NEWTON Zeke | 100% | 90% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 60 | PELLERIN Liam | 100% | 34% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 61 | HUANG Alec | 100% | 73% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 62 | DEGRYSE Leopold | 100% | 83% | 44% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 63 | KOEFERL Miles | 100% | 94% | 67% | 25% | 4% | - |
| 64 | SHINDE Aksh | 100% | 72% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 65 | NG Deacon | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 14% | 1% |
| 66 | BHOSREKAR Som | 100% | 77% | 27% | 4% | - | - |
| 67 | HASSETT Edward | 100% | 87% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 68 | MACCIOLI Daniel | 100% | 58% | 13% | 1% | - | - |
| 69 | LIU Kunshuo | 100% | 68% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
| 70 | ROTONDO Max | 100% | 94% | 67% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 70 | LAWRENCE James | 100% | 89% | 55% | 18% | 2% | - |
| 72 | KALESHIAN Julien | 100% | 99% | 58% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 73 | ANDERSON Kai | 100% | 72% | 22% | 3% | - | - |
| 74 | CUI Mason | 100% | 43% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 74 | LAQUER Tyler | 100% | 49% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 76 | HAO Zerui | 100% | 59% | 13% | 1% | - | - |
| 77 | LEE Jacob | 100% | 53% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.