Round Rock Sports Center - Round Rock, TX, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LEE Seojin | - | - | - | - | - | 7% | 93% |
| 2 | DUFF Caitlin | - | - | 2% | 16% | 44% | 38% | |
| 3 | YU Stella | - | - | - | - | 2% | 23% | 75% |
| 3 | KU Chloe | - | - | 2% | 13% | 41% | 44% | |
| 5 | CAO Kim | - | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 39% | 13% |
| 6 | PARK Chloe | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 43% | 38% |
| 7 | CHENG Anna | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 40% | 12% | |
| 8 | SARATH Sana | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 37% | 12% | |
| 9 | HU Ashley | - | - | 2% | 11% | 34% | 41% | 12% |
| 10 | YU Skylar | - | - | 3% | 18% | 43% | 35% | |
| 11 | CHERON Helene | - | - | 4% | 23% | 45% | 27% | |
| 12 | XIAO Cindy | - | - | - | 3% | 15% | 41% | 42% |
| 13 | PEREIRA Izumi | - | - | 4% | 22% | 46% | 28% | |
| 14 | CHENG Zijuan "Grace" | - | - | 5% | 24% | 46% | 26% | |
| 15 | POWERS Waverly | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 17% | 2% |
| 16 | SUTHERLAND Sadie | 1% | 12% | 33% | 36% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 17 | HWANG Charlotte | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 38% | 52% |
| 18 | DING Jolie | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 41% | 18% | - |
| 19 | CORD Sophia | - | 1% | 8% | 32% | 43% | 16% | |
| 20 | KIM Lucy | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 21 | OH Chloe | - | 5% | 26% | 43% | 22% | 4% | |
| 22 | RUSMEVICHIENTONG Lyla | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 44% | 21% | |
| 23 | SON Ellie | 11% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 24 | CLAIANU Adriana | - | 4% | 21% | 41% | 28% | 6% | |
| 25 | KIM Grace M. | 2% | 13% | 34% | 35% | 14% | 2% | |
| 26 | YANG Felicia | - | - | 4% | 21% | 43% | 30% | 1% |
| 27 | PALLADINO Aria | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 28 | MACHIRAJU Ishita | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 39% | 30% | 4% |
| 29 | FISCHER Luna | 17% | 37% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 30 | TAN Angela | 1% | 14% | 41% | 34% | 10% | 1% | |
| 31 | LIU Teresa | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 14% | 1% |
| 32 | LIN Rongxuan | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 38% | 18% | 3% |
| 33 | LIU Alyssa | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 8% | 1% |
| 34 | LIANG Katherine | 1% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 35 | YU Sydney | 2% | 13% | 35% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 36 | WEI Levana | - | 2% | 19% | 43% | 30% | 6% | |
| 37 | OEI Allyson | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 38 | PARK Hannah | 4% | 26% | 39% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 39 | KHAN Zoya | 12% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 40 | MEADE Kaia G. | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 41 | SEO Yunseo | 5% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% | |
| 42 | SIMON Mariana | 21% | 47% | 26% | 5% | - | - | |
| 43 | ONG Katherine | 2% | 16% | 44% | 30% | 7% | 1% | |
| 44 | VARAH Alaia | 1% | 11% | 32% | 37% | 17% | 2% | |
| 45 | VU Claire | 31% | 44% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
| 46 | ANUP Aadhira | 15% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 47 | VINES Annie | 12% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 48 | CHEXAL Nehali | 34% | 48% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
| 49 | WINSLOW Zaria | 3% | 19% | 42% | 28% | 7% | 1% | |
| 50 | JIN Ailin | 11% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 51 | BRAN ROSADO Victoria | 10% | 48% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 52 | LIU Michelle | 39% | 44% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 53 | KIM Nakyeong | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
| 54 | HUANG Annie | 15% | 41% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 55 | SRA Nureen | 10% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 56 | GARCIA RODRIGUEZ Victoria Maria | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 57 | GUPTA Kanak | 9% | 30% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - | - |
| 58 | BAO Amelia | 1% | 13% | 34% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 59 | LEE Chaewon | 18% | 42% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 60 | BEAVERS cole | 10% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 61 | SOUTHWELL Mia | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 62 | GANGUMALLA Srikari | 55% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 63 | ALAM Zara | 69% | 28% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 64 | ZHOU kelsey | 35% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 65 | WINGLER Ezri | 38% | 43% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.