Round Rock Sports Center - Round Rock, TX, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | URSU Marcel T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 84% |
| 2 | LI Huangziyue | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 51% |
| 3 | WANG Alex | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 60% |
| 3 | YANG Justin | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 14% | |
| 5 | CAO HAOTIAN | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 49% | 15% |
| 6 | SIDDAMSHETTY Ishaan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 34% | |
| 7 | LU Simon | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 13% | |
| 8 | YUEN Caleb | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 10% | |
| 9 | LUCAS William | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 65% | |
| 10 | WANG Theodore | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 53% | |
| 11 | HAO Johnny | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 17% | |
| 12 | KIM Enoch | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | 29% | 3% |
| 13 | SHANKAR Rahm | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | 39% | 5% | |
| 14 | AN Chris (Siyoung) | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 34% | 6% | |
| 15 | ROH Jaden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 75% | 22% |
| 16 | HUANG Keon | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 33% | 6% | - |
| 17 | KANG Jayden | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
| 18 | CHAN Troy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 22% | |
| 19 | FISCHER Noel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 42% | 3% |
| 20 | CHEN Zhengming | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 52% | 10% |
| 21 | ZHANG Caleb | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 13% | 1% | |
| 22 | KONDOGI Saivarun | 100% | 100% | 91% | 56% | 16% | 1% | |
| 23 | CAI Limo | 100% | 91% | 58% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 24 | KIM Leo | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 18% | 2% |
| 25 | CHEN Harrison | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 26 | LIU Andy | 100% | 98% | 82% | 43% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 27 | SLOAN Ethan | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 16% | 2% | |
| 28 | DUFF Michael | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 17% | 2% | |
| 29 | SUN Eon | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 31% | 6% | |
| 30 | KORIVI Ishan | 100% | 88% | 53% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 31 | GONG Johnny | 100% | 96% | 55% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 32 | SU Eric | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 28% | 5% | |
| 33 | YANG Jake | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 19% | 1% |
| 34 | PARK Jayden | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 25% | 5% |
| 35 | NUTHALAPATII Rishi | 100% | 98% | 81% | 43% | 9% | 1% | |
| 36 | DEGUZMAN Miguel Javier | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 42% | 14% | 2% |
| 37 | BALAGOPAL Aditya | 100% | 99% | 88% | 53% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 38 | SRA Nawab | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 14% | 2% | |
| 39 | CHIDAMBARAM Nivedh | 100% | 76% | 33% | 7% | - | - | |
| 40 | SALMAN Ibrahim | 100% | 100% | 92% | 59% | 18% | 1% | |
| 41 | SHEN Alaric | 100% | 94% | 68% | 31% | 8% | 1% | |
| 42 | KUANG Cyrus | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 26% | 5% |
| 43 | MILLER Graham | 100% | 97% | 71% | 29% | 5% | - | - |
| 44 | WU Allen | 100% | 92% | 61% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 45 | SHARMA Smyan | 100% | 84% | 42% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 46 | TANG Alex | 100% | 93% | 64% | 23% | 3% | - | |
| 47 | OH Caleb | 100% | 85% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 48 | KANG Nathan | 100% | 63% | 22% | 4% | - | - | |
| 49 | SAMPAT Arjun | 100% | 38% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 50 | LEE Seojun | 100% | 78% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 51 | JAIN Aarambh | 100% | 94% | 59% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 51 | SHI Mark | 100% | 89% | 51% | 13% | 1% | - | - |
| 53 | STARLING Herbert | 100% | 69% | 23% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 54 | BURLA Saiavaneesh | 100% | 64% | 22% | 4% | - | - | |
| 55 | SHI Caleb | 100% | 59% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 56 | POLES Lucas | 100% | 16% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 57 | GROVER Sebastian | 100% | 83% | 42% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 58 | UCHIYAMA Lucas | 100% | 75% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.