Fredericksburg Convention Center - Fredericksburg, VA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | CHEN Leonardo | V V V D V V | V V V V V V | 5.5 | 5 | -0.5 |
| 2 | ADDYSON Aidan | V D V V V V | V V V V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 3 | SHOUSHA Hamza | V D V V V V | V V V V D | 5.3 | 5 | -0.3 |
| 3 | AYOTTE James | V V D V V V | V V V V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
| 5 | KIM Gene | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.4 | 6 | +0.6 |
| 6 | GUMEDELLI Mohnish | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.4 | 6 | +0.6 |
| 7 | WANG Marcus | V V V D V | V V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 8 | CHAN Kyle Si Tin | V D V D V V | V V V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 9 | YU Jason | D V V V V V | V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 10 | CHANEY Charles | V D V V V V | V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 11 | ZHU Yiming | V V V V D V | V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 12 | ZHANG jonathan | V V D V V V | V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 13 | MODANLOU Navid | V V V D D V | V V D | 5.2 | 4 | -1.2 |
| 14 | HUANG Max | V V D V V D | V V D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
| 15 | DELONG Joshua | D V V V D | V V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 16 | KROPP Wesley | V D D D D V | V V V D | 3.6 | 2 | -1.6 |
| 17 | CHEN Zhengyang (Allen) | V V V V V V | V D | 5.7 | 6 | +0.3 |
| 18 | CHALLAMEL Hadrien | V V V V V | V D | 2.6 | 5 | +2.4 |
| 19 | YILMAZ Tarik | V V V V V D | V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 20 | RAPALSKI Thomas | V V V V D V | V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 21 | SUH Aiden | V V V V D V | V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
| 22 | GRIGORENKO Gleb | V D V V V V | V D | 3.0 | 5 | +2.0 |
| 23 | CHO Alex | V V V D V | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 24 | ZHAI Junqi | V V V V D | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 25 | LEECH Braedan | V V D V V D | V D | 4.7 | 4 | -0.7 |
| 26 | CHOU-ESTEBAN Pau | V V V D D V | V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 27 | SAAD Noah | D D V V V V | V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 28 | CAMP Ethan | V D V V D V | V D | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
| 29 | ARMSTRONG TyLee | D D V V V | V V D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
| 30 | JOHNSON Dieko | V V D V D D | V V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 31 | UNZHAKOV Konstantin | D V V D D D | V D | 4.3 | 2 | -2.3 |
| 32 | NOOL Alexander | V V D D D D | V V D | 3.6 | 2 | -1.6 |
| 33 | GAO Victor | V V V V V V | D | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
| 34 | WANG Devin | V V V V V V | D | 4.3 | 6 | +1.7 |
| 36 | LAU LUCAS | V D V V V | D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 37 | THOMAS Andrew | D V V V V D | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 38 | FEELY Benjamin | D V V V D V | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 39 | TOPRANI Valmik | D V V D V V | D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 39 | LOPATIN Sergei | V V V D V D | D | 1.8 | 4 | +2.2 |
| 41 | GRIGGS Kaiden | V V V D V | D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 42 | SUNKARA Vishnu | D D V V V V | D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 43 | KONG Brandon | V V V D D V | D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 44 | DIEKER Edwin | D D V V V | D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 45 | TSIEN Richard | V D D V V D | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 46 | YU Jeremy | V V D D V D | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 47 | HAM Ian | D V D D V V | V D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
| 48 | KONG Ethan | D D V V V D | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 49 | CASH William Li | D V V V D D | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 50 | BROSNAN Solomon | V D D V D V | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 51 | ALPSOY Emir | D V D D V | V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 52 | CHAN Ian | D D V D D V | V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 53 | PRABHU Srinish | V D V D D D | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 54 | CHEN Aiden | D V D V D | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 55 | BHANDARE Veer | V D D D D V | V D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
| 56 | LEE Henry | D D D V V D | V D | 3.6 | 2 | -1.6 |
| 57 | JIANG Aidan | D D V D D V | V D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 58 | ZENG Felix | V V D D D D | V D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 59 | CHONG Eden | V D D D V D | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 60 | ZHANG Shuhao | D D D D V D | V D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 61 | LEE Elijah | D D V D D D | V D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 62 | SHEYDIN Barry | D D D D V D | V D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 63 | BANG Dylan | D D D V D D | V D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 64 | KHERSONSKY Robert | D D D D D D | V D | 2.6 | 0 | -2.6 |
| 65 | CHO Adrian | V D V V D D | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 66 | ZHU Brady | D V D D V | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 67 | PARY Jean Pierre | V D D V D | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 68 | STRAFFORD Andrew | V D D V D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 69 | BAYUS Oliver | D V V D D D | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 70 | SAAD Peter | D V D D V D | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 71 | TSEN Mason | D D D D V V | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 71 | SALLAI Abel | D V D V D D | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 73 | GUO Benjamin | D V D D V D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 74 | LI Tyrese | D V D D D V | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 75 | PETROVSKI Kiril | V D D D V D | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 76 | MAXWELL Sheito | D D V D D D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 77 | DAVIS Kai | D D D V D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 78 | REYNOLDS CHANG Luke | D D D D V D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 78 | GALIOTE James | D D D D D V | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 80 | FENG Xinmin | V D D D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 81 | JUNG Max | D D D V D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 82 | WEI Noah | D D D D D V | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 83 | LEE Ryan | D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 83 | THOMAS Ethan | D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
| 85 | MILLER Balthazar | D D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 86 | KUBBA Sauvil | D D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
| 87 | BENUCCI Vincent | D D D D D D | D | 3.2 | 0 | -3.2 |
| 88 | WEI Jayden | D D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
| 89 | WORMACK Anthony Jr. | D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.