Fredericksburg Convention Center - Fredericksburg, VA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | DOELL Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 46% |
| 2 | LIM EUNSEONG | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 53% |
| 3 | FANG Haoyu | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 53% |
| 3 | WEI Winston | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 38% |
| 5 | WANG Mendy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 75% | 33% |
| 6 | ZHAI Derrick | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 42% |
| 7 | KIM Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 35% | |
| 8 | ZHAO Ryan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 48% | 12% |
| 9 | SONG HAN GYEOL | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 40% | 7% |
| 10 | RAU Shogun | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 37% | 7% |
| 10 | ZHENG Marcus | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 49% |
| 12 | LIU Aaron | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 42% |
| 13 | CHANG Parker | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 37% | |
| 14 | PLUMMER Waylon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 17% |
| 15 | HUYNH Matthew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 39% | |
| 16 | HUANG Dalynn | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 29% | 4% |
| 17 | LIU Alex | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 35% | |
| 18 | ARORA Maximilian Andras A. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 18% | 3% | < 1% |
| 19 | JAZWINSKI Ryan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 54% | 16% | 1% |
| 20 | YANG David H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 10% |
| 21 | WEI JR Shan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 14% | |
| 21 | OH Joshua | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 21% | |
| 23 | TIAN Dylan | 100% | 95% | 67% | 27% | 5% | - | |
| 24 | XIE Jayden | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 22% | 3% |
| 25 | SHOU Raymond | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 21% | 3% |
| 26 | ULYSSE Jacob | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 45% | 12% | 1% |
| 27 | ZHAI Alex | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 32% | 6% | - |
| 28 | WU Wallace | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 23% |
| 29 | KUO Phineas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 34% | |
| 30 | LEE Kyle | 100% | 96% | 74% | 34% | 8% | 1% | |
| 31 | KUBBA Krish | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 42% | 11% | 1% |
| 32 | LEONG Samuel | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 33 | TAN Charlie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 16% |
| 34 | CHOI Hunter | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 46% | 16% | 2% |
| 35 | WANG Freyr | 100% | 99% | 85% | 52% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 36 | LI Aaron | 100% | 100% | 90% | 60% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 37 | ZHANG Eric | 100% | 100% | 98% | 79% | 41% | 10% | 1% |
| 38 | ZHONG Tian | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 34% | 6% |
| 39 | ZHENG Lerui | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 19% | 3% |
| 39 | CHEN Ethan | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 25% | 6% | - |
| 41 | KIM Ethan | 100% | 91% | 58% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 42 | YANG Luca | 100% | 88% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 43 | LEE Ryan | 100% | 60% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
| 44 | ZHONG Yi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 50% | 15% |
| 45 | ZHENG Austin | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 45% | 12% | 1% |
| 46 | FAN Ze Lin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 53% | 15% |
| 47 | STIRLING CHARLES | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 16% |
| 48 | PAN Gary | 100% | 99% | 87% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 49 | SONG Enoch | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 50 | LIN Lucas | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 44% | 9% | |
| 51 | NANAYAKKARA Dinuth | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 35% | 6% | |
| 52 | PACK Lindsey | 100% | 98% | 78% | 39% | 9% | 1% | |
| 53 | CAO Joshua | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 21% | 3% | |
| 53 | BRADY David | 100% | 89% | 51% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 55 | TIMCHENKO Fiodor | 100% | 86% | 47% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 56 | CHEN Kyler | 100% | 94% | 70% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 57 | XU Ryan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 49% | 14% | 1% |
| 58 | FAYVUSOVICH Emmanual | 100% | 100% | 90% | 61% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 59 | CAO Aaron | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 13% | 1% |
| 60 | LI Andrew | 100% | 98% | 82% | 51% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 61 | JIAO Daniel | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 62 | MORALES Tycho | 100% | 82% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 63 | MCCOOL Henry | 100% | 95% | 71% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 64 | LEONG Michael | 100% | 68% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 65 | CONVERSO-PARSONS Alexander | 100% | 90% | 53% | 15% | 1% | - | |
| 66 | PARK Joshua | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 67 | KIAYIAS Anthony | 100% | 97% | 76% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 68 | HUDSON Jedidiah | 100% | 90% | 56% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 69 | LIN Oliver | 100% | 75% | 30% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 70 | TIAN Andy | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 11% | 1% |
| 71 | XU Jonathan | 100% | 74% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 72 | KAZAKEVICH Kanstantsin | 100% | 88% | 32% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 73 | XU Jason | 100% | 100% | 96% | 72% | 32% | 7% | - |
| 74 | XU Rambert | 100% | 89% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 75 | LIU Mason | 100% | 80% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 76 | TSENG Lucas | 100% | 98% | 81% | 42% | 10% | 1% | |
| 77 | ROBERTSON Liam | 100% | 84% | 46% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 78 | WEBER Andrew | 100% | 99% | 88% | 52% | 11% | 1% | |
| 79 | ALANAZI Saif | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 41% | 10% | 1% |
| 80 | HOLLANDER Max | 100% | 95% | 69% | 29% | 6% | - | - |
| 81 | AGARWAL Jagrav | 100% | 91% | 61% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 82 | MAYER-STALEY Jace | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 17% | 2% |
| 83 | HUYNH Kaleb | 100% | 95% | 70% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 84 | CHEN Keegan | 100% | 73% | 29% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 85 | YANG George | 100% | 22% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 86 | TINGLE Byrd | 100% | 88% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 87 | SUN Andrew | 100% | 69% | 24% | 3% | - | - | |
| 88 | ITWARU Logan | 100% | 56% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 89 | HUANG Anthony | 100% | 73% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 90 | KLINE Benjamin | 100% | 48% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 91 | WU Connor | 100% | 74% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 92 | NG Chuck | 100% | 72% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 93 | HYUN Francis | 100% | 80% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 94 | MONTGOMERY Henry | 100% | 24% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.