Fredericksburg Convention Center - Fredericksburg, VA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CUELLAR Markus | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 25% |
| 2 | ALEXANDER Jacksen | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 35% | 8% |
| 3 | KOGAN Yelisey L. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 27% | 5% | |
| 3 | ZUNIGA Carlos Andres Flores | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 58% | 24% | 5% |
| 5 | FIAMINGO Francisco | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 59% |
| 6 | WANG Kaiyan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 55% | 18% |
| 7 | CASH William Li | 100% | 98% | 82% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 8 | ARZT Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 12% | |
| 9 | BAYUS Oliver | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 39% | 12% | 1% |
| 10 | TARCHICHI Robby | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 50% | 15% |
| 11 | MARISI Gabriel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 31% | |
| 12 | WANG Eason | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 31% | 6% |
| 13 | LEECH Braedan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 35% | 5% |
| 14 | LEE Henry | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 10% | |
| 15 | STRAFFORD Andrew | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 10% | 1% | |
| 16 | URIA Sullivan | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 17 | ZHANG Eric I. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 26% | 4% | |
| 18 | MCCABE Kian | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
| 19 | RAMEY Daylon | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 19% | 3% | |
| 20 | EDGECOMB Michael J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 38% | |
| 21 | OSHIMA Robert | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 22% | 3% | |
| 22 | CARNALL Hunter | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 7% | |
| 23 | EVANS George | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 22% | 2% |
| 24 | BROSNAN Solomon | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 39% | 12% | 2% |
| 25 | ABU-AJAJ Mohamed | 100% | 93% | 66% | 30% | 8% | 1% | |
| 26 | BANG Dylan | 100% | 97% | 78% | 43% | 13% | 2% | |
| 27 | JARRATT Isaac | 100% | 95% | 62% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 28 | HERDMAN Julian | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 23% | 4% | |
| 29 | LORENZ Nathan | 100% | 85% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 30 | KIM Zac | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 18% | 3% | |
| 31 | SAAD Peter | 100% | 90% | 58% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 32 | CANDELARIA Armando | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 11% | |
| 33 | DELONG Mike | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 17% | |
| 34 | NALLICHERI Ayaan | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 8% | |
| 35 | GANZY Ethan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 11% | |
| 36 | BATISTA Julian | 100% | 96% | 75% | 39% | 11% | 1% | |
| 37 | MCCLEAN III Walter F. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 42% | 11% | |
| 38 | VELLALA Avinash | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 40% | 10% |
| 39 | EVANS Joseph | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
| 40 | HALE Bradley | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 41 | KONG Ethan | 100% | 89% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 42 | PERI Mourya | 100% | 86% | 52% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 42 | SCORDINSKY Liam | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
| 44 | KHAW-BRIOT Julien | 100% | 96% | 75% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 45 | CHONG Eden | 100% | 73% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 46 | SOVA Thomas | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 30% | 5% | |
| 47 | BUI Ryan | 100% | 99% | 83% | 43% | 11% | 1% | |
| 48 | ZAKHAROV Konstantyn | 100% | 47% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 49 | BEUTLER Andreas | 100% | 95% | 71% | 33% | 8% | 1% | |
| 50 | CHAU Collin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 34% | 7% |
| 51 | SALLAI Abel | 100% | 91% | 59% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 52 | SACKETT Gavin | 100% | 74% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 53 | PETROVSKI Kiril | 100% | 78% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 54 | SAAD Noah | 100% | 93% | 67% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 55 | TAURMAN Jr. Patrick J. | 100% | 90% | 58% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 56 | PRABHU Srinish | 100% | 75% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 56 | CHOI Joshua | 100% | 29% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 58 | CHIU Sebastian | 100% | 68% | 25% | 5% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.