Manalapan, NJ - Manalapan, NJ, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | PATURU Meghana | D V V V D | V V V V V | 4.5 | 3 | -1.5 |
2 | DROVETSKY Alexandra M. | V V V V D V | V V V V D | 5.2 | 5 | -0.2 |
3 | TOLBA Salma | V D D V V | V V V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
3 | NI Emma | D V V V D | V V V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
5 | BELSLEY Devon K. | V V V D V | V V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
6 | KULKARNI Diya | V D D V V | V V V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
7 | MAO Amy | D V D V V | V V V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
8 | GAO Judy | V V D D D | V V V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
9 | GU Sarah | V V V V V | V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
10 | ZHANG Tina | V V V V V | V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
11 | PAN Michelle | V V V D V V | V D | 3.2 | 5 | +1.8 |
12 | LEE Olive | V V V D V | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
13 | LU Junyao | D V V V V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
14 | KOKES Ava | V V D V D | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
15 | GOLDBERG Sophie C. | D D V V V | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
16 | EBRAHIM Ameera H. | D D V V V | V V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
17 | LIN Katie Y. | V D V V V | D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
18 | DE JAGER Celine | D V V V V | D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
19 | ZAKHAROV Anne E. | D V V V V | D | 1.9 | 4 | +2.1 |
20 | KOWALSKY Rachel A. | V D V V D V | D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
21 | HONG Elaine | D D V V V V | D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
22 | COBERT Helen G. | V D V V D | D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
23 | BIGGS Amelia F. | D V V D V | D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
24 | CHAN Elizabeth | V V D D V | D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
25 | PARTE Isabella B. | V D V D V | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
26 | NICOU Nicole | D V D V D | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
27 | XU Jessica | V D D V D | V D | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
28 | MING Cynthia | D D V V D | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
29 | SLACKMAN Valerie | V D D D V | V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
30 | LIN Julia L. | D V D D V D | V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
31 | BRANDWEIN Elizabeth | D V D D D | V D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
32 | LI AnnieSiliang | D D D D V | V D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
33 | ZENG Katrina | V D D V D | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
34 | CHANG Ella | V D D D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
35 | GUZZI Jordan | V D D D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
36 | SINGH Aayushi | D D D V D | D | 0.3 | 1 | +0.7 |
37 | LONGSTREET Olivia | D V D D D | D | 0.3 | 1 | +0.7 |
37 | HARJANI Meher | D V D D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
39 | XU Amy | V D D D D | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
40 | LI Alisha | D V D D D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
41 | PATEL Viha | D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
42 | BONAR Natalia | D D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
43 | SHI Angela L. | D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.