Manalapan, NJ - Manalapan, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | PATURU Meghana | - | - | - | 7% | 36% | 56% | |
| 2 | DROVETSKY Alexandra M. | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 42% | 38% |
| 3 | TOLBA Salma | - | 1% | 8% | 33% | 45% | 13% | |
| 3 | NI Emma | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 40% | 17% | |
| 5 | BELSLEY Devon K. | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 35% | 10% | |
| 6 | KULKARNI Diya | - | - | 2% | 16% | 44% | 38% | |
| 7 | MAO Amy | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
| 8 | GAO Judy | - | 8% | 29% | 39% | 20% | 4% | |
| 9 | GU Sarah | - | - | 9% | 34% | 42% | 15% | |
| 10 | ZHANG Tina | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 42% | 22% | |
| 11 | PAN Michelle | - | 5% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 12 | LEE Olive | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 10% | |
| 13 | LU Junyao | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 26% | |
| 14 | KOKES Ava | - | 5% | 27% | 42% | 23% | 4% | |
| 15 | GOLDBERG Sophie C. | 2% | 14% | 35% | 34% | 13% | 2% | |
| 16 | EBRAHIM Ameera H. | - | 4% | 31% | 43% | 19% | 3% | |
| 17 | LIN Katie Y. | - | - | 2% | 15% | 41% | 41% | |
| 18 | DE JAGER Celine | 1% | 8% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 5% | |
| 19 | ZAKHAROV Anne E. | 5% | 27% | 43% | 21% | 3% | - | |
| 20 | KOWALSKY Rachel A. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 38% | 13% |
| 21 | HONG Elaine | 4% | 20% | 37% | 28% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 22 | COBERT Helen G. | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 11% | |
| 23 | BIGGS Amelia F. | 2% | 22% | 40% | 27% | 8% | 1% | |
| 24 | CHAN Elizabeth | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 25% | |
| 25 | PARTE Isabella B. | - | 5% | 25% | 45% | 23% | 3% | |
| 26 | NICOU Nicole | 10% | 35% | 36% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 27 | XU Jessica | 32% | 42% | 21% | 5% | - | - | |
| 28 | MING Cynthia | 6% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
| 29 | SLACKMAN Valerie | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% | |
| 30 | LIN Julia L. | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 31 | BRANDWEIN Elizabeth | 33% | 45% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
| 32 | LI AnnieSiliang | 1% | 18% | 39% | 31% | 10% | 1% | |
| 33 | ZENG Katrina | 19% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 34 | CHANG Ella | 11% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | |
| 35 | GUZZI Jordan | 21% | 47% | 26% | 5% | - | - | |
| 36 | SINGH Aayushi | 73% | 24% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 37 | LONGSTREET Olivia | 75% | 23% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 37 | HARJANI Meher | 39% | 42% | 16% | 3% | - | - | |
| 39 | XU Amy | 2% | 13% | 35% | 35% | 14% | 2% | |
| 40 | LI Alisha | 15% | 38% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 41 | PATEL Viha | 14% | 61% | 23% | 3% | - | - | |
| 42 | BONAR Natalia | 22% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 43 | SHI Angela L. | 6% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 6% | 1% | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.