Manalapan, NJ - Manalapan, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LIAO Lu Jia (Lucy) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 62% | 18% | |
| 2 | HO Brianna W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 26% | |
| 3 | LESLIE Ryanne T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 51% |
| 3 | PEVZNER Victoria | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 33% |
| 5 | LUNG Katerina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 78% | 14% |
| 6 | SADAN Jordan E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 50% | |
| 7 | ACHILOVA Feyza | 100% | 100% | 97% | 74% | 30% | 5% | |
| 8 | SHAW Kayla M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 62% | 18% | |
| 9 | TAN Kaitlyn N. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 54% | 17% | 2% |
| 10 | DAVIA Daniella V. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 68% | 24% | |
| 11 | YE Eileen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 65% | 20% | |
| 12 | HUANG NATALIE | 100% | 99% | 91% | 58% | 19% | 2% | |
| 13 | ADAMS KIM Natalie | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 31% | 5% | |
| 14 | TOBIN Brean | 100% | 97% | 61% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
| 15 | CHEN Kelly | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 23% | |
| 16 | SEO IRENE Y. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 55% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 17 | FERRETTI Anna Rebecca | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 31% | |
| 18 | PAHLAVI Dahlia | 100% | 100% | 91% | 47% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 19 | MAK Tinney | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 79% |
| 20 | LI Meilin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 26% | 3% |
| 21 | CHO Rebecca H. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 28% | 4% | |
| 22 | YU Lauren C. | 100% | 75% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 23 | BASSON Bayley D. | 100% | 95% | 68% | 24% | 4% | - | |
| 24 | PAVE Claire | 100% | 100% | 92% | 62% | 21% | 2% | - |
| 25 | XU Madison | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 51% | 14% | 1% |
| 26 | CHEN Allison V. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 47% | 11% | |
| 27 | GU EMILY | 100% | 100% | 92% | 52% | 14% | 1% | |
| 28 | YU Jaime L. | 100% | 94% | 66% | 26% | 5% | - | |
| 29 | XU Christine | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 64% | 20% | |
| 30 | SLASKI Caroline O. | 100% | 65% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
| 31 | GARDINER Sophia A. | 100% | 94% | 37% | 6% | - | - | |
| 32 | FURST Chloe | 100% | 82% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 33 | KOENIG Charlotte R. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 68% | 24% | |
| 34 | JONES Jenna | 100% | 55% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 35 | MCKEE Alexandra K. | 100% | 100% | 91% | 59% | 19% | 1% | - |
| 36 | MCGILLION-MOORE Katie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 17% |
| 37 | WONG Sophia M. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 30% | 4% | |
| 38 | HEISER Anna M. | 100% | 77% | 30% | 5% | - | - | |
| 39 | MUELLER Tatum J. | 100% | 100% | 85% | 35% | 6% | - | |
| 40 | THIRUVENGADAM Harini | 100% | 78% | 21% | 2% | - | - | |
| 41 | ZHANG Alina C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 40% | 7% |
| 42 | NICOU Melina | 100% | 73% | 21% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 43 | OLIVEIRA Lavinia M. | 100% | 85% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 44 | LIU Sophia | 100% | 100% | 94% | 66% | 24% | 2% | - |
| 45 | GINDE Maithili | 100% | 69% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 46 | JIN Wendy | 100% | 38% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 46 | CHEN Jasmine | 100% | 47% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 48 | SIMONOV Dasha | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 47% | 14% | 1% |
| 49 | CUNNINGHAM Kelsey | 100% | 50% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 50 | LEE Kaitlyn | 100% | 12% | - | - | - | - | |
| 51 | ROHRING Anna L. | 100% | 18% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.