Sunnyvale, CA - Sunnyvale, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | IVE Isaac L. | V V V V V | V V V V V | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 2 | CAI Kevin P. | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
| 3 | HOLDERNESS Landon | V V V V D | V V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 3 | DESOUZA Hansel S. | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
| 5 | YULE Alexander L. | D V V V V | V V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 6 | SCRIBNER Aidan C. | V D D V V | V V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 7 | ANDERSON Elias W. | V D D V V | V V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 8 | ALVAREZ Ian T. | D D V D V V | V V V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 9 | RAJPAL Sartaj S. | V V V V V | V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
| 10 | SHARMA Sanil | V V D V V | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 11 | GARRETT Samuel | V V V D D V | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 12 | KIM Benjamin I. | D V V D V | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 13 | MENEGOLI Lorenzo | V D V V D | V V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 14 | DORRELL Connor I. | V V D D D V | V V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 15 | MA Victor | D D V D V | V V D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 16 | WICKBOLDT Eric | D V D D D | V V D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 17 | SHAMIS Mark | V V V V V V | D | 5.0 | 6 | +1.0 |
| 18 | VAN EIKEMA HOMMES Neil B. | V V V V V | D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 19 | KIM PAUL | D V V V V | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 20 | GOLDMAN Rami | V V V V D D | D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 21 | PALLI Maximillian | D D V V V | V D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
| 22 | DESSAUER Tobyn M. | D V D V V | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 22 | BARRY Dominick | D V V D V | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 24 | WISOFF Jeffrey | V V V D D | V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 25 | SHUR Yakov C. | V D V V D | V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 26 | AU Marcus J. | V V D V D D | V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 27 | JIN daniel | D V D V V D | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 28 | TARBUSKOVICH III John | V D V D D | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 29 | KULIGOWSKI Bartosz | D V V D D | V D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
| 30 | PETERSON Elliot F. | V V D D D | V D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 31 | HWANG Samuel W. | D D D V D | V D | 3.0 | 1 | -2.0 |
| 31 | KOH Tommy | D V D D D | V D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 33 | MILOSLAVSKY Jack | V D V V D | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 33 | BHARGAV Siddharth | V V D D V | D | 0.6 | 3 | +2.4 |
| 35 | TAMHANKAR Neil | D V D D V V | D | 1.0 | 3 | +2.0 |
| 36 | ZIEBART Jeremy J. | V D D V D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 37 | KOPPE Alexander | V D D D V | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 37 | WEAVER Neil | D V D D V | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 39 | SIVAGAR Leo | D D D V V | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 40 | LEE Trevor | V D D D V D | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 41 | LEVITSKY Jonathan | D D D V V D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 42 | WILT Zachary A. | D D V D D | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 43 | SOOHOO Jackson F. | V D D D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 44 | SOLTER Kai | D D D V D D | D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
| 45 | WONG Nathan | D D D D V D | D | 3.3 | 1 | -2.3 |
| 46 | AMAYA Jonas M. | D D V D D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 47 | STENNIS Brendan | D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 48 | KOPPE Benjamin | D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
| 49 | ONTIVEROS Miller | D D D D D | D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 |
| 50 | MILEY Nick N. | D D D D D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 | |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.